| | |

Guest Op Ed: The UCRP Train Wreck

The UCRP Train Wreck

Professor Steven Lippman
George W. Robbins Chair in Management
UCLA Anderson School of Management

UCOP intends for the employers’ contribution to UCRP be ratcheted up to 20% by July 1, 2017. The now-planned contribution of 20% from all employers of UC personnel (which includes NIH and other granting agencies as well as the hospitals and medical centers) and 7% from all employees falls short of preventing the current $13 Billion underfunding at UCRP from worsening. At present, employees plus employers pay in 6% of the $8 billion covered compensation (CC) which amounts to $480 million per year. This 6% contribution began May 15, 2010. [Covered compensation is that portion of earnings upon which your pension benefits are paid. It doesn’t include summer salary and a small number of other items that apply to a few UC faculty members, but otherwise CC is total salary.]

UCOP’s plan is for the employees to pay in 7% and for the employers to pay in 20%. This amount totals $2,160 million annually. Necessarily, the additional $1,680 million over and above this year’s contribution must come from the UC operating budget, from hospital patients, from the granting agencies, from additional tuition increases, and from the pockets of UC employees.

And as if this situation isn’t gloomy enough, the $13 billion underfunding of UCRP will grow not only during the seven year course of the build up to 27% of CC contributions, but it would grow even if the 27% contribution were to begin today. This circumstance results from the confluence of two factors. First, the normal cost of 17.6% is needed to keep a fully funded UCRP fully funded. Second, the missing $13 billion would, according to plan, earn 7.5% annually. This amounts to .075($13B) = $975 million. The earnings of $975 million will not materialize because the $13 billion is missing. [It is not missing because someone misappropriated it. It is missing because annual earnings on the UCRP portfolio have been less than 7.5% over the last few years and because contributions were not made for 20 years.]

When added to the normal cost of .176($8B) = $1,408 million, the amount needed to keep the underfunding from growing is $2,383 million or 29.79% of CC. Finally, on July 1, 2017, the day when the 27% contribution level is attained, the shortfall will exceed $22.8 billion so that a total contriubtion from employees and employers of more than 48% of CC will be needed to prevent the shortfall from growing even further. To make the obvious explicit: due to the current shortfall at UCRP, UC and its employees will soon find themselves in a world of hurt. Even with the planned upon 27% annual contribution, amortization of the shortfall over the next 40 years is exceedingly unlikely if not impossible.

UCOP understands and is well aware of this simple arithmetic. My holiday wish is that Governor Brown and the legislature will understand this arithmetic – – and then lend a helping hand to prevent the coming train wreck. Without substantial help from Governor Brown and the legislature, tuition will continue to rise markedly, employees will continue to receive 0% COLAs, and the underfunding at UCRP will continue to increase.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Academic Senate Rejects New Pension Tier

    Representatives of UC faculty on all campuses delivered a strongly worded rejection of the proposed 2016 pension tier. Reports from the campuses were extensive and overwhelmingly negative (link to PDF). Berkeley faculty called the proposal “imprudent and potentially fiscally irresponsible.” Davis faculty said, “It is a myth that UCRP is too generous,” and went on to detail a long list of likely negative outcomes from the new tier. Irvine faculty noted “the level of disappointment and depth of passion expressed from all quarters about the negative impact that the imposition of the PEPRA cap has on the future of the…

  • |

    Faculty Voice Opposition to Pension Proposal

    On Friday, the UCLA Academic Senate hosted an informational meeting that explained in clear terms that this is a bad, bad plan for faculty. What to do about it was less clear cut. Shane White gave a deeply detailed account of financial aspects of the plan (Slides here: Pension Presentation by Shane White). Among the things we learned: Last year’s budget deal introduced the “PEPRA cap” to UC retirement benefits. This is not a limit on retirement pay-outs, but a cap on the earnings that are used to calculate retirement pay-outs. So any new hire after July 1, 2016 who…

  • | | |

    Pension Changes Proposed: lower benefits, little savings, weaker UCRS

    The University of California will soon have a third pension tier if the Regents approve a plan put forth by the Retirement Options Task Force on Friday. UC President Janet Napolitano charged the Task Force, which included management and Academic Senate representatives, with finding a way to implement her agreement with Gov. Brown to set a cap on pension benefits in exchange for state funds to support the pension system. Over the weekend, as faculty activists read the task force report and a second report produced by Senate leaders (Guide to reviewing the recommendations of the Retirement Options Task Force)…

  • | | |

    The Degradation of Faculty Welfare and Compensation

    Colleen Lye and James Vernon (UC Berkeley Faculty Association) UC faculty need to wake up to the systematic degradation of their pay and benefits.  In 2009, when the salary furlough temporarily cut faculty salaries between 6 and 10%, faculty were outraged.  Yet since then our compensation has been hit by a more serious, and seemingly permanent, double blow. First, despite modest salary rises of 3% and 2% in October 2011 and July 2013, faculty take-home pay has been effectively cut as employee contributions to pension and healthcare have escalated.  Faculty now pay more for retirement and healthcare programs that offer less.  Secondly, faculty are…

  • | |

    PBS’ Hot Potato May Not Be on California Stations

    As far as yours truly can tell, the major PBS affiliates in California have so far taken a pass on the hot potato program described below.  That decision could have been because the threatened pension initiative that would have swept in UC was originally aimed at the November 2014 ballot.  With it apparently off the ballot for now (see earlier posts), some stations might air the program.  On verra. The Wolf of Sesame Street: Revealing the secret corruption inside PBS’s news division On December 18th, the Public Broadcasting Service’s flagship station WNET issued a press release announcing the launch of…

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Tradition!

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a report on UC and CSU funding.  LAO is usually viewed as a neutral agency.  But it is a component of the legislature.  So it tends to favor approaches that add to legislative control as opposed to, say, gubernatorial control.  This report is no exception. LAO seems to want to return to what it terms the “traditional” approach to funding, but with bells and whistles added to monitor legislative goals.  The traditional approach seems to be one focused on undergraduate enrollment.  But in fact the tradition – such as it is – has…