| |

If X = amount of algebra you learned in high school and 2X = 0, how much algebra did you learn?

Byuclafaculty


A complaint about UC’s view on remedial math as taught in community colleges appeared today in the Sacramento Bee: (excerpt)
Community colleges are struggling to address a huge problem: remedial mathematics. In fall 2009, 143,587 California community college students enrolled in remedial math to become eligible for college math, but only 18 percent went on to complete a college math course within three years. Given these results, policymakers are questioning the use of scarce public dollars to “pay for the same education twice.” If students didn’t learn algebra in high school, why are we paying for it again in college? Are these students even cut out for college?  Here’s the good news: A growing number of community colleges have developed an innovative new approach for students who are under-prepared for college math. It is less expensive than the traditional curriculum and significantly more effective. The innovation has been spotlighted by several national organizations focused on college completion.
Now the bad news: The approach may be killed before the year is out. At least 16 California community colleges are offering a new pathway for students in majors that are not algebra-intensive. Instead of spending up to four semesters reviewing arithmetic and algebra, students in the new pathways might spend just one semester in a prerequisite course tailored to statistics.
The logic is simple: Different majors require different math preparation. An engineering student needs extensive algebra to be successful in a higher-level calculus course, while an English major needs very little algebra to be successful in statistics. If a student arrives underprepared for college-level work, shouldn’t remediation focus on the math that students actually need in their chosen pathway, rather than simply repeating their prior schooling?
…Despite their promise, statistics pathways face formidable opposition from some faculty leaders in the community college system, as well as inside the University of California and California State University systems. Faculty widely acknowledge that little algebra is needed for the study of statistics. However, a vocal contingent continues to insist that all students should be required to complete intermediate algebra, whether or not it is relevant to their major.  This vocal contingent is fighting hard to block pathway reform. The battleground is whether CSU and UC will recognize the new courses as valid prerequisites for college statistics. If they insist that only intermediate algebra will be recognized as proof of “college readiness” in math – and refuse to award transfer credit for statistics courses with alternative remedial preparation – the reform is unlikely to survive...
Full article at
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/10/v-print/4974786/new-approach-to-remedial-math.html
Answer to the question in the title is below:

Similar Posts

|

Spotlight on Speech Codes, 2022

Byadmin

Fire (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) has just released its yearly summary of the state of free speech at 481 public and private colleges and universities in the United States. FIRE defines free speech as “the overwhelming majority of speech protected by the First Amendment.” Few exceptions exist. The survey addresses a wide variety of issues with relevance to free speech, including: Free Speech Zone PoliciesPrior RestraintsSecurity Fee PoliciesPolicies Governing Speakers, Demonstrations, and RalliesPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechInternet Usage PoliciesPolicies on Tolerance, Respect, and CivilityBullying PoliciesThreats and IntimidationHarassmentPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechObscenityIncitement The report is both disappointing…

| | | | | | |

Listen to Part of the Regents Afternoon Session of 1-22-2014

Byuclafaculty

As we have noted in numerous prior posts, the Regents refuse to archive their meetings beyond one year.  So we dutifully record the sessions in real time.  Below is a link to part of the afternoon session of Jan. 22.  This segment is mainly the Committee on Educational Policy.  Gov. Brown was in attendance.  We will separately (later) provide links just to certain Brown segments.  But for now, we provide a continuous recording. There was discussion of designating certain areas of UC-Merced as nature reserves, followed by discussion of a new telescope.  The discussion then turned to online ed and…

| | | | | | | | |

Tradition!

Byuclafaculty

The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a report on UC and CSU funding.  LAO is usually viewed as a neutral agency.  But it is a component of the legislature.  So it tends to favor approaches that add to legislative control as opposed to, say, gubernatorial control.  This report is no exception. LAO seems to want to return to what it terms the “traditional” approach to funding, but with bells and whistles added to monitor legislative goals.  The traditional approach seems to be one focused on undergraduate enrollment.  But in fact the tradition – such as it is – has…

|

Oversize Load?

Byuclafaculty

From the Sacramento Bee: …(T)the University of California’s academic student workers union recently filed a complaint against the UC Office of the President demanding that discussions about class size be a part of their contract negotiations. The union has been bargaining with UC since last summer, and its contract expired at the end of the year… The UC Student-Workers Union, which represents more than 12,000 teaching assistants, tutors and readers across the UC system, is seeking a regular forum to talk about class size with faculty and UC management, said Josh Brahinsky, a Ph.D. candidate in the history of consciousness…

| | | |

Napolitano Responds to UCLA’s Moreno Report

Byuclafaculty

Moreno UC President Napolitano issued a response to the (former California Supreme Court Justice Carlos) “Moreno Report” of Oct. 2013, formally titled “Independent Investigative Report on Acts of Bias and Discrimination Involving Faculty at the University of California, Los Angeles.”  It includes directives to all campus chancellors: 1) Every campus should designate an official to serve as its lead discrimination officer. This official is responsible for ensuring that an appropriate response is made to all reports of perceived acts of discrimination, bias, and harassment involving faculty, students, and staff from all parts of the campus. * The discrimination officer will…

| | | | | |

The Resurrection?

Byuclafaculty

[More in our Regents coverage.  See earlier posts.]  The Regents spent some time on the old Master Plan for Higher Ed.  There was discussion, according to news reports, among representatives of UC, CSU, and the community colleges on better coordination. …“This report shines an important light on the need to have a central body whose sole focus is guiding the Legislature, governor and our three higher education segments as we plan and build for the future,” (Assembly speaker John Pérez) said. Full story at http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-college-reports-20140123,0,5215408.story Um, does no one remember  CPEC, which still exists in ghostly form as a website…