|

You Might Not Know It But We Are In the 3rd Year of a 4-Year Plan to Raise Faculty Salaries to Market Competitiveness

Nostalgia Department:

Just to let you know, below is a letter from then UC-President Robert Dynes to campus chancellors:

September 25, 2007

CHANCELLORS

Dear Colleagues:

I am writing to convey good news with regard to faculty salaries. Now that the California State budget has been passed, The Regents have approved the first year of a four-year plan of faculty salary increases designed to raise faculty salaries to market competitiveness and to restore the integrity of the rank and step system of faculty advancement.

In 2006, the Academic Senate systemwide Committee on Academic Personnel prepared a report on the present status of the UC merit and promotion system and recommended that the faculty salary scale system be returned to a more regulated, rational, and transparent structure. The four-year plan approved by The Regents will restore the system where our regular merit and promotion reviews are directly linked to faculty compensation through an appropriate set of faculty salary scales.

The first year of the plan has three important components that each play a key role in achieving these goals. First, we will apply an across-the-board 2.5 percent general range adjustment that will raise the salary of every faculty member (compared to a figure of 2 percent last year) in accordance with campus implementation procedures.

Second, there will be an additional market adjustment to the salary scales at each rank and step that will raise salaries for those faculty whose salary matches or is close to the rank and step level they have achieved through our merit system of advancements. The market adjustments will reflect an overall increase of 1.5 percent to our total faculty salary budget and will have an impact on more than half of the faculty.

The range adjustment and the market adjustment will be combined to create new faculty salary scales effective October 1, 2007. The new faculty salary scales will be issued soon and will be available on the Office of the President Academic Personnel Web site.

Finally, merit advancements have been funded as usual, increasing the salary budget by a further 1.8 percent this year. More than a third of the faculty will receive such merit increases, corresponding to their individual review cycle, with salary increases effective July 1, 2008.

In total, the faculty salary budget will be raised by 5.8 percent (= 2.5 percent + 1.5 percent + 1.8 percent) this year, noticeably higher than the 3.8 percent of last year. Many faculty will, of course, ultimately receive greater percentage increases than this and necessarily some lower, depending on their individual eligibility for the merit and market increases.

Of most importance, we will have moved the faculty scales closer to actual salaries, leading to greater significance and usefulness of the scales that served the University so well in the past. We believe all faculty will see benefits in this overall strategy in not only raising individual salaries, but also in strengthening the value of the faculty salary system to their colleagues, particularly the more junior faculty, and to their departments.

It is also important to stress that this represents the first year of an intended four-year program that will provide similar range, market, and merit increases next year, followed by two additional years of larger range increases and standard merit advancements once the scales have been effectively restored. Of course, we wish that we could achieve our final goal more quickly, and necessarily the future three years depend on favorable University budgets. But the current salary increases are an important first step, and we are heartened by the enthusiastic and unequivocal support of The Regents for the overall program.

I urge you to convey this information directly to your faculty, providing any additional explanatory detail as you find necessary. This plan provides us all with an opportunity to make a renewed commitment to our faculty, an extraordinary resource to the people of California.

Sincerely, Robert Dynes

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    AAUP / AFT Affiliation Agreement

    The AAUP and AFT have drafted a new affiliation agreement that will be voted on at the June AAUP meeting. Some details: “Under the terms of this affiliation agreement, all AAUP members, by virtue of their membership in the AAUP, will also be members of the AFT/AFL-CIO… AAUP members and AAUP chapters will have access to AFT support and services, including specific AFT member benefits… This affiliation will not result in an increase in national AAUP dues and, for current AAUP members, AFT per capita will be covered as part of the AAUP dues… The national AAUP and its chapters…

  • |

    Spotlight on Speech Codes, 2022

    Fire (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) has just released its yearly summary of the state of free speech at 481 public and private colleges and universities in the United States. FIRE defines free speech as “the overwhelming majority of speech protected by the First Amendment.” Few exceptions exist. The survey addresses a wide variety of issues with relevance to free speech, including: Free Speech Zone PoliciesPrior RestraintsSecurity Fee PoliciesPolicies Governing Speakers, Demonstrations, and RalliesPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechInternet Usage PoliciesPolicies on Tolerance, Respect, and CivilityBullying PoliciesThreats and IntimidationHarassmentPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechObscenityIncitement The report is both disappointing…

  • | | | |

    UCOP Study Shows Decline in Faculty Compensation

    A year ago Colleen Lye and James Vernon, co-chairs of the Berkeley Faculty Association, drew the attention of faculty across the ten campuses of the University of California to the continuing degradation of their pensions, benefits and salaries. Increasing employee contributions to health insurance and pensions were compounding the negative impact of slow salary group, they argued, and retirees faced fewer choices for healthcare. Now UCOP’s own study of total remuneration has confirmed much of their argument. The executive summary of this document contains the following depressing bullet points: Between 2009 and 2014, UC’s total remuneration fell from 2% below…

  • | | |

    The Degradation of Faculty Welfare and Compensation

    Colleen Lye and James Vernon (UC Berkeley Faculty Association) UC faculty need to wake up to the systematic degradation of their pay and benefits.  In 2009, when the salary furlough temporarily cut faculty salaries between 6 and 10%, faculty were outraged.  Yet since then our compensation has been hit by a more serious, and seemingly permanent, double blow. First, despite modest salary rises of 3% and 2% in October 2011 and July 2013, faculty take-home pay has been effectively cut as employee contributions to pension and healthcare have escalated.  Faculty now pay more for retirement and healthcare programs that offer less.  Secondly, faculty are…

  • | | | | | | |

    Listen to Part of the Regents Afternoon Session of 1-22-2014

    As we have noted in numerous prior posts, the Regents refuse to archive their meetings beyond one year.  So we dutifully record the sessions in real time.  Below is a link to part of the afternoon session of Jan. 22.  This segment is mainly the Committee on Educational Policy.  Gov. Brown was in attendance.  We will separately (later) provide links just to certain Brown segments.  But for now, we provide a continuous recording. There was discussion of designating certain areas of UC-Merced as nature reserves, followed by discussion of a new telescope.  The discussion then turned to online ed and…

  • |

    Oversize Load?

    From the Sacramento Bee: …(T)the University of California’s academic student workers union recently filed a complaint against the UC Office of the President demanding that discussions about class size be a part of their contract negotiations. The union has been bargaining with UC since last summer, and its contract expired at the end of the year… The UC Student-Workers Union, which represents more than 12,000 teaching assistants, tutors and readers across the UC system, is seeking a regular forum to talk about class size with faculty and UC management, said Josh Brahinsky, a Ph.D. candidate in the history of consciousness…