| | | | | | | |

Plenty of Nothing

Byuclafaculty

Here is a quote from the governor’s recent budget proposal: “The University of California (UC) will receive an increase of $90 million General Fund for base operating costs, which can be used to address costs related to retirement program contributions.”

Question: What does it mean?  Answer: Nothing.  UC has always been free to take its general revenue and put it into the pension fund.  Indeed, since the state has so far refused to resume paying the employer contribution for state-funded employees into the pension fund, that is what UC has been doing.
Question: If it means nothing, why are you discussing it?  Answer: It appears that some folks up in Oakland view this statement as a kind of recognition of a state liability for the UC pension.  As we have documented repeatedly, before the two-decade pension contribution “holiday,” the state routinely paid its contribution, even putting in IOUs when it was short of cash.  When the state paid in, whether in cash or in IOUs, that action allowed UC to collect from non-state sources, currently roughly $2 from non-state for every $1 of state.
 
Earlier in the state budget crisis, then-Governor Schwarzenegger put a token $20 million in his budget proposal for the UC pension.  But the legislature – acting on advice of the Legislative Analyst – deleted the $20 million and inserted budgetary language that there was no state liability.  That perverse language was later removed, but since then there has been zero progress in getting state recognition of its liability.  Note that CSU, which is part of CalPERS, does not have this burden since the state does not dispute its liability to the giant CalPERS system.
If UC depicts the governor’s non-statement as amounting to more than nothing, we will continue to get just that: nothing.  As we have noted before, if the state wants to privatize UC, not taking responsibility for the pension liability is a good way to do it.  The Regents can’t create money.  They cannot raise taxes.  They can only keep raising tuition.
So let’s not pretend nothing is something.  This song sums it up nicely:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_GSYVhGGKE&w=320&h=195]
The quote from the budget is at http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/StateAgencyBudgets/6013/6440/department.html
A history of UC pension funding by Faculty Association Executive Director Susan Gallick is at http://www.uclafaculty.org/FASite/Home_files/UCRPCAPolicyOpt2012%20.pdf

Similar Posts

| | |

Faculty associations address UCOP

Byhigbie

The UCLA Faculty Association is part of a UC-wide coalition of faculty associations known as CUCFA–the Coalition of UC Faculty Associations. Through CUCFA, UC faculty are able to address the UC Office of the President on issues of importance to faculty, their students, and staff. Below is a round-up of recent communication between CUCFA and UCOP. UC Union Coalition on Health Insurance Costs CUCFA signed on to a joint letter from unions representing employees across the UC system expressing concern with large increases in the cost of health insurance. The unions requested a meeting to “address what appears to be…

| | | |

Report from the National AAUP Convention

Byadmin

Council of UC Faculty Associations (CUCFA, of which UCLA-FA is the UCLA chapter) President Constance Penley attended the historic National AAUP convention on June 16-18 in Arlington, VA, as the CUCFA delegate, which meant that she had an opportunity to vote on the proposed alliance between the AAUP and the AFT (AFL-CIO) and to fill six open AAUP Council seats. Read her report from the Convention at the CUCFA website.

Faculty call for pause on budget & network security changes at UCLA

Byhigbie

Over 250 UCLA faculty, including a large number of department chairs and center directors, have written Chancellor Block with a detailed critique of plans for administrative centralization. The letter follows earlier exchanges between department chairs and Executive Vice Chancellor/Provost Emily Carter and other top administrators. “Although we appreciated the fora that EVC/P Carter recently organized in response to an earlier letter requesting more time to evaluate the re-organization plans she is proposing, we continue to feel that there has been insufficient time or detail to evaluate their consequences and that we have not been adequately involved in the consultation process,”…

| | |

Academic Council knocks UCOP data policy

Byhigbie

The Academic Council of the UC Academic Senate called for significant revisions to a proposed new university policy on “Research Data and Tangible Research Materials.” The Council characterized the proposed policy as, “overly broad, difficult to enforce, and a potential danger to faculty intellectual property.” Previously, the Berkeley Faculty Association criticized the policy as a solution in search of a problem, and a danger to faculty academic freedom. As the BFA noted, the policy opens with a sweeping assertion of new university rights, “The Regents of the University of California owns all Research Data and Tangible Research Materials,” and goes…

|

Chris Newfield @ UCLA, Feb. 22

Byhigbie

Public Universities under Trump Lessons from the Era of Privatization Wednesday, February 22, 3:30-5 PM 6275 Bunche Hall, UCLA Free and open to the public. Location Information Privatization, student debt, and over-building have led public universities to the brink of disaster. So argues UCSB professor Christopher Newfield in his new book. Only by embracing their