http://www.latimes.com/news/local/education/la-fi-hiltzik-20100713,0,416314.story?track=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+latimes%2Fnews%2Feducation+%28L.A.+Times+-+Education%29
UC must put emphasis on education, not brand Timothy Hampton, Garrison Sposito Tuesday, July 13, 2010, San Francisco Chronicle The UC Board of Regents will discuss this week a proposal by the University of California president’s office for an ambitious plan to market UC online. The proposal entertains the vision of an eventual online bachelor’s degree that could tap new students throughout the world, from “Sheboygan to Shanghai.” In fact, the track record for online higher education is very uneven. It requires enormous up-front investments and continual investments for upgrades. Given these high stakes and the financial pressures on UC…
A recent working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research suggests that private universities react asymmetrically to shocks to their endowments. In particular, they overreact to negative shocks by cutting their operating budgets. That may suggest that, in the aftermath of their recent big financial losses, the privates were not as aggressive in raiding UC as they could have been but also that this effect is likely to wear off. That is, the endowment-loss effect may have shielded UC for a time, but we cannot count on it continuing. Below is a summary of the paper: Why I Lost…
The UC Post-Employment Benefits Taskforce was hosted by the UCLA Academic Senate on 5-4-10. Below are links to audios (videos with a still picture) of that session. The audios are in 10 parts. Parts 1-8 run about 14 minutes each. Parts 9 and 10 run about 8 minutes each. You can access these audios at the following addresses: PEB audios 5-4-10 Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8 Part 9 Part 10 (end)
Just a Reminder that Not Everyone Loves UChttp://hjta.org/california-commentary/taxpayers-deserve-better-return-their-investmenthttp://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/07/07/ED3C1EA83I.DTLhttp://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0707-uc-jewish-20100707,0,1141548.story
(As the op ed below suggests, folks are beginning to become aware of the potential controversy that will surround the report of the UC Commission on the Future, to be released soon. NOTE: The same op ed appeared June 21 in another newspaper and was posted to the now-defunct savingUCLA website and then copied to this website earlier.) Bakersfield Californianhttp://www.thecalifornian.com/print/article/20100705/OPINION02/7050302/Thomas-Elias-UC-regents-to-put-pressure-on-Sacramento July 5, 2010UC regents to put pressure on Sacramento By Thomas Elias It’s almost as if the Board of Regents that runs the University of California can’t wait to fire a warning shot across the figurative bow of Gov. Arnold…
The UC Commission on the Future met at Covel Commons, UCLA, on Dec. 7, 2009. There were four basic segments: Public, Staff, Faculty, and Students. The Public and Staff Segments are in 7 Parts: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 (end) The Faculty Segment is in Three Parts: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 (end) The Student Segment is in 4 Parts: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 (end)
The furlough and minimum wage issues are getting closer. The governor can’t order UC to pay minimum wage or impose new furloughs. But – as noted in prior posts – the issue is whether UC will be politically able to go its own way when other state workers (including those at CSU) are subject to furloughs and minimum wages. As also noted previously, the imposition of the min wage does not depend on whether cash is available to pay full salaries. It depends only on whether a budget is in place on July 1, which seems unlikely. PolitiCal (LA Times)…
