The California Legislative Analyst has a nice chart showing budget priorities for the state over the past decade with higher ed a clear laggard. It is at: http://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0BzVLYPK7QI_4ODUzM2YzYzMtYmEzZS00MzE…
By Matt Krupnick Contra Costa Times Posted: 06/11/2010 04:00:00 PM PDT Updated: 06/11/2010 06:01:23 PM PDT Student fees should be called “tuition,” a University of California panel is recommending, marking a possible end to a decades-long refusal to use the word in California public higher education. While the recommendation by the Commission on the Future may seem trivial, the change would signal a philosophical shift for the 10-campus university. UC, as well as the California State University system, have long claimed publicly that students do not pay tuition, defined as the cost of instruction. At the same time, university leaders…
(Editorial Note: No mention in article below of $2-for-$1 pension problem which leads to money lost to UC. As previous posts have noted, inadequate contributions to UC pension lead to major losses of non-state funds.) UC: Millions lost in research costs from grants Nanette Asimov, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer Wednesday, June 16, 2010 The University of California misses out on hundreds of millions of dollars each year that could be used to bolster campus budgets because it is too passive in recovering research-relatedcosts as other universities do, a UC advisory group has found. UC could gain $300 million a…
The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a new proposal to the legislature that UC create a funding plan for its pension liability. The new language is below in italics. This new approach represents a shift for LAO and opens the door to state recognition of state pension funding obligations to UC. As prior posts have noted, each state dollar NOT contributed to the plan costs the plan an additional $2 in lost non-state contributions and ultimately drains the UC budget.University of California Retirement Plan Proposed LAO Compromise: Senate Plus Budget Bill Language 6-14-10 6440-001-0001 Provision 17. The Legislature requests…
Ventura County StarThursday, June 17, 2010 It’s almost as if the board of regents that runs the University of California can’t wait to fire a warning shot across the figurative bow of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the state Legislature and the candidates now running for those positions. “Show us more money,” UC’s leaders seem to be saying, “or we’ll make some radical changes that your constituents won’t like very much.”Since regents are appointed to 12-year-terms, they will not have to face furious voters if those changes come; the politicians would have to. When it meets July 13 in San Francisco, the…
Extra $$$s for CalPERS from State; zero for UCRP! Governor uses market numbers to set the CalPERS contribution rate! Governor to give CalPERS more funds than it asked for. Dale Kasler, Sacramento Bee, Dec. 06, 2009 With the State facing a $20.7 billion deficit over the next year and a half, Governor Schwarzenegger is willing to raise the State’s annual CalPERS contribution to $4.8 billion in the next fiscal year, even though CalPERS officials only asked for $4.1 billion. Why give more? Because the Governor thinks it is more prudent to pay the CalPERS tab as quickly as possible and…
Can CalPERS keep its Promises? San Francisco, Reuters, Oct. 23, 2009 Jim Christie, Reporting and Analysis This article reports that CalPERS lost more than $56 billion in its most recent fiscal year. Most likely contributions will increase significantly, at least by 2011-12. But the choices are hard: increasing contributions by public workers to their retirement plans, potentially by up to 50% for some employees; raising taxes to cover higher contribution rates absorbed by government agencies, which may also jump by 50%; cutting public services and payrolls to shift money to retirement plans; …
The Troubles at UCRP 1. Under normal circumstances, 17.02% of covered compensation (your base salary) is the annual contribution required to maintain a healthy pension fund. For all of UC, this amounts to $1.3395 billion. The Regents’ 2010-2011 proposed budget funds UCRP at just over one third this amount. Thus, the Regents’ plan will underfund UCRP by $867 million in the academic year 2010-2011. 2. Circumstances are not normal: UCRP is no longer a fully funded pension plan. Part of this problem arose because of poor market returns, but most of the shortfall can be attributed to the 20 year…
A new report by the Legislative Analyst is out: http://www.lao.ca.gov/2009/bud/fiscal_outlook/fiscal_outlook_111809.pdfApart from the general grim outlook for the state, there is a section on higher ed and UC. However, the pension issue is not covered in that section. Rather, it appears on page 38 in a section on state retirement costs. No Additional State Payments for UC Retirement Programs Assumed. Consistent with past funding practices, our forecast assumes no additional state contributions between 2009‑10 and 2014‑15 to cover costs of UC’s pension and retiree health programs. Both have unfunded liabilities, and currently, no significant contributions are being paid by UC or…
What are the risks in UC turning to the federal government for funding? Is UC Davis really a national university? Read on…. “As California tightens purse strings, UC turns to Uncle Sam” by Laurel Rosenhall Tuesday, Oct. 06, 2009, Sacramento Bee This article outlines what the federal government has given to UC to help bail the system out of the current budget crisis and what UC wants in the future. In the current budget year, $700 million in federal stimulus funds went to UC to fill the gap in state funding as well as millions of federal dollars that fund…
