|

Boomerang Recruitment: UC-Berkeley Wins Two Back from UT-Austin

Berkeley’s allure tugs faculty couple back from Texas (excerpt)

By Matt Krupnick
Contra Costa Times
Posted: 11/02/2010 12:00:00 AM PDT
Updated: 11/07/2010 10:56:59 PM PST

BERKELEY — They sold the house, took their son out of day care, packed up all their belongings and left for a new life at the University of Texas. Then, a year later, Jennifer Johnson-Hanks and William Hanks turned around and came right back to UC Berkeley, a rare boomerang move for professors who leave a campus.

“We liked Austin, but it wasn’t home,” said Johnson-Hanks, a demographer and sociologist who was hired at UC Berkeley for her first teaching job in 2000. “I didn’t know how much that would matter. It just turned out that it did matter a lot. I was homesick.”

As with the Hanks, UC Berkeley’s allure is a major selling point for university leaders who are constantly fighting off hiring attempts by competing universities. The Hanks — she is 39, he is 58 — represent something of the perfect faculty pair for Berkeley; Johnson-Hanks is establishing herself as a young star in her field, while her husband is well-established as an expert in Mayan culture and language.

The double-barreled hiring of the Hanks in 2009 had been considered something of a coup by Texas, which has made a point of targeting University of California faculty in the wake of recent budget cuts. A Texas committee has reviewed faculty rosters from UCLA and Berkeley within the past two weeks, said Mark Hayward, a University of Texas sociologist and director of the school’s Population Research Center.

“Yes, we’re looking at that as a fertile recruiting ground,” said Hayward, who recruited Johnson-Hanks to Austin. “The long-term future of California is in doubt. We were actually looking at people in California specifically to recruit faculty who were looking at pay cuts.” …

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    AAUP / AFT Affiliation Agreement

    The AAUP and AFT have drafted a new affiliation agreement that will be voted on at the June AAUP meeting. Some details: “Under the terms of this affiliation agreement, all AAUP members, by virtue of their membership in the AAUP, will also be members of the AFT/AFL-CIO… AAUP members and AAUP chapters will have access to AFT support and services, including specific AFT member benefits… This affiliation will not result in an increase in national AAUP dues and, for current AAUP members, AFT per capita will be covered as part of the AAUP dues… The national AAUP and its chapters…

  • | | | |

    UCOP Study Shows Decline in Faculty Compensation

    A year ago Colleen Lye and James Vernon, co-chairs of the Berkeley Faculty Association, drew the attention of faculty across the ten campuses of the University of California to the continuing degradation of their pensions, benefits and salaries. Increasing employee contributions to health insurance and pensions were compounding the negative impact of slow salary group, they argued, and retirees faced fewer choices for healthcare. Now UCOP’s own study of total remuneration has confirmed much of their argument. The executive summary of this document contains the following depressing bullet points: Between 2009 and 2014, UC’s total remuneration fell from 2% below…

  • | | |

    The Degradation of Faculty Welfare and Compensation

    Colleen Lye and James Vernon (UC Berkeley Faculty Association) UC faculty need to wake up to the systematic degradation of their pay and benefits.  In 2009, when the salary furlough temporarily cut faculty salaries between 6 and 10%, faculty were outraged.  Yet since then our compensation has been hit by a more serious, and seemingly permanent, double blow. First, despite modest salary rises of 3% and 2% in October 2011 and July 2013, faculty take-home pay has been effectively cut as employee contributions to pension and healthcare have escalated.  Faculty now pay more for retirement and healthcare programs that offer less.  Secondly, faculty are…

  • | |

    USC Has a Bad Patch

    We posted yesterday about the news from UC-Berkeley that many earthquake-prone buildings are located in southern California – including in Westwood.  The Westwood-Century City Patch, in picking up the story from the LA Times, blamed USC instead of UC-B, at least in the headline.  See above.  Probably just as well.  Who wants to be the bearer of bad tidings?.

  • |

    UC-Berkeley Releases Its Earthquake Survey to the LA Times

    We have followed the LA Times‘ story of the concern about certain concrete buildings in the southern California area which might be at risk in a major earthquake.  The Times identified some buildings in an earlier story but noted that UC-Berkeley had a survey list of buildings.  Berkeley was reluctant to provide the list because its intent was to get an estimate of the number of such buildings based on public records rather than evaluate each building directly.  It has now provided the Times with the list, along with a legal disclaimer.  The Times now has an interactive map on…

  • | |

    Quake Response

    We noted in a prior post there would be increased attention to earthquake risks in LA around the 20th anniversary of the Jan. 27, 1994 Northridge quake.  One item that began to develop was an LA Times article indicating that various buildings were at risk in the LA area, even though they were thought safe when constructed.  One of the buildings in Westwood is owned by UCLA, which asserted that it had been upgraded.  It was also reported that a team of researchers at Berkeley had compiled a list of such buildings, but was not making the list available due…