Pension Principles

Byuclafaculty

Dear FA at UCLA Members,

The University is in the process of developing a New Pension Tier, with
lower benefits and higher contributions, which would be offered to all new
employees as of July 1, 2013. Current employees in UCRP may be given a
choice between staying in UCRP or choosing the New Pension Tier, but for
those who stay in UCRP, the contributions will increase and likely be higher
than those offered in the New Pension Tier.  For more information, go to
www.uclafaculty.org and look under Post Employment Benefits Taskforce.

The current development phase of pension redesign offers faculty and all
employees an opportunity to respond and influence the final decision.
However, in this case, the timeline for response is extremely short: Nov. 1
for feedback to President Yudof, who will decide on which option to present
to the UC Regents, for a final decision in mid November.

Members of the Executive Board of the Faculty Association at UCLA have
studied the proposed options and the dissenting opinions and voted for the
Executive Board to join with the Berkeley Faculty Association, Senate
faculty members throughout the UC system, and UC unions (including the
UC-AFT, representing Lecturers and Librarians) in endorsing a list of shared
principles to guide decision-makers. Due to the short time period, we do not
have sufficient time to poll our members to see if the Faculty Association
as a whole wishes to endorse the list of shared principles or not. For this
reason, the endorsement will be in the name of the Executive Board only. If
any FA member would like to join us in supporting these principles, please
click on this link and forward your name to bobsamuels_us@yahoo.com

SHARED PENSION PRINCIPLES

1. We need to move to a full funding of the normal cost of UCRP. The
suggested new tiers do not address this issue.

2. There needs to be a credible plan for total remuneration.

3. We need to begin paying down the UCRP liability now.

4. We need more people paying more into UCRP and not fewer people
paying less.

5. There needs to be a full discussion of alternative plans with the
inclusion of faculty and staff at all levels.

6. We need a plan to pre-fund retiree healthcare.

7. We need to work together to get the state to pay its share of the
employer contributions.

8. The university should end supplemental retirement packages for
Senior Managers.

9. Any changes to the pension plan and retiree health should not
discriminate against low- and medium-wage employees.

10. We oppose raising the employee contributions to a high level in
order to induce current employees to opt into a new system.

If any FA member would like to join those supporting these principles,
please click on this link and forward your name to bobsamuels_us@yahoo.com

MEMBER FEEDBACK
The UCLA FA Board invites members of the FA to provide feedback about these
principles. Either email us at ucfa@earthlink.net or post a comment to this blog post. We also
welcome FA members to volunteer to be on the Executive Board.

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    The Degradation of Faculty Welfare and Compensation

    Byuclafaculty

    Colleen Lye and James Vernon (UC Berkeley Faculty Association) UC faculty need to wake up to the systematic degradation of their pay and benefits.  In 2009, when the salary furlough temporarily cut faculty salaries between 6 and 10%, faculty were outraged.  Yet since then our compensation has been hit by a more serious, and seemingly permanent, double blow. First, despite modest salary rises of 3% and 2% in October 2011 and July 2013, faculty take-home pay has been effectively cut as employee contributions to pension and healthcare have escalated.  Faculty now pay more for retirement and healthcare programs that offer less.  Secondly, faculty are…

  • | |

    PBS’ Hot Potato May Not Be on California Stations

    Byuclafaculty

    As far as yours truly can tell, the major PBS affiliates in California have so far taken a pass on the hot potato program described below.  That decision could have been because the threatened pension initiative that would have swept in UC was originally aimed at the November 2014 ballot.  With it apparently off the ballot for now (see earlier posts), some stations might air the program.  On verra. The Wolf of Sesame Street: Revealing the secret corruption inside PBS’s news division On December 18th, the Public Broadcasting Service’s flagship station WNET issued a press release announcing the launch of…

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Tradition!

    Byuclafaculty

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a report on UC and CSU funding.  LAO is usually viewed as a neutral agency.  But it is a component of the legislature.  So it tends to favor approaches that add to legislative control as opposed to, say, gubernatorial control.  This report is no exception. LAO seems to want to return to what it terms the “traditional” approach to funding, but with bells and whistles added to monitor legislative goals.  The traditional approach seems to be one focused on undergraduate enrollment.  But in fact the tradition – such as it is – has…

  • | |

    Anti-Pension Group Opens the Door to ID Fraud

    Byuclafaculty

    That’s a harsh headline.  But it applies to any group that publishes info on the web – because it is technically legal  to obtain and publish it  – that identifies incomes of individuals.  And the same harsh headline applies to govt. salary data, not just pensions.  It applies whether there is a political objective, as in the pension case, or just a way to get eyeballs to a commercial website.  While there may be a case for such disclosures for top executives and elected officials, wholesale publication deserves harsh headlines.  For details on the latest such development, see: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/02/04/6125543/government-reform-group-launches.html And,…

  • | | |

    Pension Initiative Seems to Be Out of Gas (for Now)

    Byuclafaculty

    Earlier posts noted a pension initiative drive – fronted by San Jose Mayor Chris Reed – that would have swept in UC.  For now, the effort seems to have stalled.  The proponents have decided to litigate the title and summary by the attorney general of the initiative.  Effectively, that will take enough time so that they will not be able to gather the signatures needed to get the initiative on the November 2014 ballot.  The decision to litigate may just be a polite way to bow out for now.  See:http://www.sacbee.com/2014/01/30/6116016/public-pension-measure-likely.html Of course, if your car stalls for whatever reason, you…

  • | | | | | |

    Issue Heating Up

    Byuclafaculty

    We noted in yesterday’s posting (in the update portion) on the Regents public comment session that there were spokespeople complaining about anti-Israel activities on UC campuses including course credit on one campus, pushes for divestment, etc.  Earlier postings noted statements by the UC prez and several chancellors (including Block) opposing an academic boycott of Israel by several academic societies.  Today, the LA Times reports: A group of lawmakers has formed the California Legislative Jewish Caucus to weigh in on issues of priority to members, including immigration, civil rights and Israel, according to its chairman, state Sen. Marty Block (D-San Diego)… …