|

CSU rejects criticism of its legislative scorecard

We have referred in earlier posts to the rather surprising disclosure that CSU produced an online “scorecard” rating members of the legislature on their votes on matters of concern to higher ed.  While it is not surprising that CSU would keep track of legislative votes, rating them and publishing the ratings is, well, unusual.  It has produced legislative complaints.  But CSU seems to be toughing it out on this issue. From the Sacramento Bee‘s Capitol Alert blog:

Two state senators – one Democrat and one Republican – demanded Thursday that the California State University system’s trustees tell them who authorized spending for a “legislative report card” that rated lawmakers on how well they supported the system’s political goals.  Sens. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, and Joel Anderson, R-Alpine, both received low marks in the CSU compilation of votes and other actions affecting the system’s political agenda this year.  The report card was apparently a parting gesture by Chancellor Charles Reed, who has announced his retirement. No legislator earned an “A” grade in the report…  Michael Uhlenkamp, a CSU spokesman, said of the Yee-Anderson request: “The issuing of the CSU’s legislative scorecard was approved by campus presidents, the executive staff at the chancellor’s office and the chancellor. “As with any decision coming from the chancellor’s office, final approval of the scorecard came from Chancellor Reed. I would point out that while Senators Anderson and Yee apparently didn’t receive the scorecard favorably, we have received positive feedback from student and alumni groups and legislators as well.”

Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/11/two-senators-demand-answers-on-csus-legislative-scorecard.html#storylink=cpy

Full story at:

The scorecard is at:
Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/11/two-senators-demand-answers-on-csus-legislative-scorecard.html#storylink=cpy

Yours truly would not call this approach – either the scorecard or toughing it out now – on the part of CSU the wise course of action.  Note that any independent group affiliated with CSU, i.e., some alumni organization, could have produced such a scorecard and avoided the charge of using taxpayer money for politics.

Apparently, Chancellor Reed is going to do it his way:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6E2hYDIFDIU?feature=player_detailpage]

Similar Posts

  • | | | | | | |

    Listen to Part of the Regents Afternoon Session of 1-22-2014

    As we have noted in numerous prior posts, the Regents refuse to archive their meetings beyond one year.  So we dutifully record the sessions in real time.  Below is a link to part of the afternoon session of Jan. 22.  This segment is mainly the Committee on Educational Policy.  Gov. Brown was in attendance.  We will separately (later) provide links just to certain Brown segments.  But for now, we provide a continuous recording. There was discussion of designating certain areas of UC-Merced as nature reserves, followed by discussion of a new telescope.  The discussion then turned to online ed and…

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Tradition!

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a report on UC and CSU funding.  LAO is usually viewed as a neutral agency.  But it is a component of the legislature.  So it tends to favor approaches that add to legislative control as opposed to, say, gubernatorial control.  This report is no exception. LAO seems to want to return to what it terms the “traditional” approach to funding, but with bells and whistles added to monitor legislative goals.  The traditional approach seems to be one focused on undergraduate enrollment.  But in fact the tradition – such as it is – has…

  • | | | | | |

    The Resurrection?

    [More in our Regents coverage.  See earlier posts.]  The Regents spent some time on the old Master Plan for Higher Ed.  There was discussion, according to news reports, among representatives of UC, CSU, and the community colleges on better coordination. …“This report shines an important light on the need to have a central body whose sole focus is guiding the Legislature, governor and our three higher education segments as we plan and build for the future,” (Assembly speaker John Pérez) said. Full story at http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-college-reports-20140123,0,5215408.story Um, does no one remember  CPEC, which still exists in ghostly form as a website…

  • | | | | | |

    Issue Heating Up

    We noted in yesterday’s posting (in the update portion) on the Regents public comment session that there were spokespeople complaining about anti-Israel activities on UC campuses including course credit on one campus, pushes for divestment, etc.  Earlier postings noted statements by the UC prez and several chancellors (including Block) opposing an academic boycott of Israel by several academic societies.  Today, the LA Times reports: A group of lawmakers has formed the California Legislative Jewish Caucus to weigh in on issues of priority to members, including immigration, civil rights and Israel, according to its chairman, state Sen. Marty Block (D-San Diego)… …

  • | |

    UC Is Drying Up

    You’ve probably heard that Gov. Brown has declared a drought emergency.  So UC is there – Johnny on the spot – with a pledge to save water for the guv: University of California President Janet Napolitano today (Jan. 16) announced a goal of reducing per capita water use by 20 percent throughout the UC system by the year 2020.  As California experiences some of its driest weather on record, Napolitano said the university must step up and contribute to the preservation of the state’s most precious resource.  “The University of California has long been a leader in conservation efforts,” she…

  • |

    Demographic Shift

    News accounts have focused on this chart in Gov. Brown’s recent budget proposal which shows the Latino/Hispanic state population exceeding the white-Anglo population by July.  That the shift would occur sometime this decade was obvious from the 2010 Census.  A news account indicates that the shift will occur in March.  Clearly, putting an exact date on the shift is not really possible.  But the change will definitely have occurred by the next Census.  (Official state estimates for the California population at the time of the 2010 Census were way off.  So interim estimates between Census years always have a significant…