|

How the (budget) sausage is being made

You are not supposed to want to know how sausages are made. The making of the state budget sausage – as a prior post noted – is supposed to happen in the legislature by June 15. For any kind of tax extension or tax-related ballot measure, a 2/3 vote is needed which means a few GOP legislators must go along.

Public sector unions have been pushing Gov. Brown to abandon the idea of a vote on tax extensions although they have not explained how he is supposed to get a 2/3 vote for his tax extensions. But they have said that they think if tax extensions do somehow get to the ballot, they will be defeated. And they have said they don’t want to spend the money for a TV ad campaign in favor of extensions, given that assumption. They also have said they don’t want an all-cuts budget.

Some Republicans are now moving toward the tax extension vote idea, precisely because they think it can be defeated. To make sure it is, they have suggested they will go along with a ballot measure only if the taxes cease on July 1 so that voters would in effect be voting in November or whenever on tax increases rather than extensions.

What they seem to want is a budget that “kicks the can down the road.” That sound bad but in fact the Legislative Analyst has pointed to the fact that the Brown budget plan does more than just balance the budget in the common-sense English definition of balance, i.e., one year’s inflows = outflows. It also proposes to fix past sins (essentially debt) that has accumulated. The Leg Analyst has noted, as has yours truly, that a multi-year workout – which is a non-pejorative way of saying kick the can down the road – is an option that should be considered.

More details on all of this can be found at http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/09/3687493/union-chief-says-jerry-browns.html

Or you can see it directly:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UWmk4TDoZs&w=320&h=195]

Similar Posts

  • |

    Report: Affordable Public Higher Education is Possible Today

    A report this week from Reclaim California Higher Education (a coalition of faculty and student groups) makes the case that affordable (even free) higher education is within reach for California. The privatization experiment has failed. The harm to a generation of hard-working, high-aiming young people is proven. It’s time to return to what works: the proven Master Plan for higher education in California. California, with its own resources, can afford to restore top-quality, accessible, affordable college and university opportunity to every qualified student. In fact, Californians can afford nothing less. You can read a summary and download the entire report…

  • | |

    Jerry Brown Suggests Master Plan is Dated

    Our previous post covered the Jan. 22 meeting of the Regents’ Committee on Educational Policy.  As noted, there was discussion of the 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education, considered a major accomplishment of Brown’s father when he was governor. Below is a link to Brown’s comments in which he suggested the Plan was now dated.  [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RmjI4gVync?feature=player_detailpage]

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Tradition!

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a report on UC and CSU funding.  LAO is usually viewed as a neutral agency.  But it is a component of the legislature.  So it tends to favor approaches that add to legislative control as opposed to, say, gubernatorial control.  This report is no exception. LAO seems to want to return to what it terms the “traditional” approach to funding, but with bells and whistles added to monitor legislative goals.  The traditional approach seems to be one focused on undergraduate enrollment.  But in fact the tradition – such as it is – has…

  • |

    7 Wasn’t So Lucky

    The cash statement from the California state controller for the first seven months of fiscal year 2013-14 is out.  Revenues are up about 1% from last year at this time.  That gain is not very good.  However, it may be largely due to an aberration last fiscal year when there was a surge of personal income tax revenue in January 2013.  The surge seemed to have something to do with antics back then in Washington over fiscal cliffs, etc., which might have resulted in some tax changes (but didn’t).  The current DC crisis de jour is the debt ceiling, but…

  • | | | | | |

    The Resurrection?

    [More in our Regents coverage.  See earlier posts.]  The Regents spent some time on the old Master Plan for Higher Ed.  There was discussion, according to news reports, among representatives of UC, CSU, and the community colleges on better coordination. …“This report shines an important light on the need to have a central body whose sole focus is guiding the Legislature, governor and our three higher education segments as we plan and build for the future,” (Assembly speaker John Pérez) said. Full story at http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-college-reports-20140123,0,5215408.story Um, does no one remember  CPEC, which still exists in ghostly form as a website…