Pension Initiative OK’d for Circulation

The pension initiative that was filed by legislative Republicans negotiating with Gov. Brown on the state budget now has a title and summary language and so it can be circulated for the needed signatures. It includes UC and would override the Regents’ pension changes enacted last December. Like all initiatives, however, unless someone wants to spend $1-$2 million for commercial firms to get those signatures, it won’t go beyond this stage. The added summary language is below. The actual text of the initiative is below that:

May 23, 2011
Initiative 11-0007 (Amdt. #1-NS.)

The Attorney General of California has prepared the following title and summary of the chief
purpose and points of the proposed measure:

MODIFIES PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PENSION BENEFITS. ELIMINATES AUTHORITY TO SET PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFITS BY CONTRACT OR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

Sets retirement age at 62 for persons who are or will be public employees. Limits pensions to 60 percent of employee’s highest average base wage for three consecutive years. Requires employees match public agency pension contribution. Mandates public employees work fulltime for five consecutive years to receive pension. Provides public agency full discretion to modify pensions, and prevents pension changes through contract or collective bargaining. Retains current pension benefits for legislators and public employees retiring before initiative is effective. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Major reductions in state and local defined benefit pension contributions — potentially totaling billions of dollars per year (as measured in today’s dollars) — over the long run. These reductions would be offset to an unknown extent by increases in other compensation costs for some public employees, depending on labor market conditions and future decisions made by governmental entities. (11-0007.)

= = =

Note that the initiative takes away collective bargaining on pensions:

Public agencies shall retain exclusive authority to modify the terms of pension, retiree health, or other retirement benefits provided to its employees and may not relinquish such authority in any employee contract or collective bargaining agreement.

Apart from the content of the initiative, that element would likely create a strong incentive for public sector unions to put money into an opposition campaign should the initiative end up on the ballot.

= = =

The full text of the initiative is below:

INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO VOTERS SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS

A. Government has an obligation to provide adequate health and retirement benefits to its employees;

B. At the same time, government has a responsibility to its taxpayers to insure that such benefits are reasonable and adequately funded;

C. Pension benefits for existing employees are excessive and threaten the economic viability of state and local governments. A recent report by the State’s Little Hoover Commission concludes that the current system is fiscally “unsustainable;

D. Government finance experts have determined that the pension and retiree health provided public employees are significantly more generous than other states. It has been reported that more than 15,000 persons receive pension benefits in excess of $100,000 per year. Under the current system, some public employees can actually receive more income in retirement than they earned while working.

E. In the 1930’s, our state established a retirement age for government employees of 65. Now many government employees can retire in there 50’s, notwithstanding a much longer life expectancy. As a result, many retirees will receive a government pension for more years than they actually worked for the government.

F. The current system has led to billions of dollars of unfunded liabilities for pension obligations of government employees. The taxes needed to adequately fund such benefits would crush the economy. The investment proceeds needed to fund such benefits are non-existent. Many local governments will be threatened with bankruptcy if no change is made right now.

SECTION 2. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

A. The people hereby enact the “Public Employee Pension Reform Act” to;
1) provide fiscally responsible pension benefits for all government employees; and
2) Reform the excessive pension benefits provided to current government employees.

SECTION 3. Public Employee Pension Reform Act Section 12 of Article VII of the California Constitution is added to read:

Sec. 12(a) Public agencies may provide reasonable pension benefits for all employees hired after the effective date of this section, subject to all of the limitations of this section.

(b) Any plan providing for pension benefits for employees of a public agency who are employed on the effective date of this section, shall comply with retirement age limitation in subdivision (f)(1), whether enacted by law or by contract, notwithstanding section 9 of Article I.

(c) This section does not apply to or limit disability benefits for public agency employees or death benefits for families of public agency employees.

(d) Public agencies shall retain exclusive authority to modify the terms of pension, retiree health, or other retirement benefits provided to its employees and may not relinquish such authority in any employee contract or collective bargaining agreement.

(e) A public agency may not provide retroactive increases in pension benefits to any public agency employee under any plan.

(f) A public agency providing pension benefits to its employees shall:

(1) provide for full retirement ages of all employees no less than 62 years of age;

(2) require a public agency employee to have been a full time employee of one or more public agencies for at least five consecutive years;

(3) limit retirement benefits for a public agency employee to no more than sixty percent (60%) of the highest annual average base wage of the employee over a period of three consecutive years of employment by a public agency. Any additional p
ayment, including but not limited to, overtime pay, bonus pay, severance pay, and payments for accrued but unused vacation and sick days shall be excluded from calculating the annual average base wage.

(4) require the public agency employee to contribute an amount at least equal to the amount provided by the public agency to fund the plan.

(g) As used in this section: (1) “Public agency employee” and “employee” mean a person who is or becomes a full-time employee of a public agency. (2) “Public agency” means the state or a political subdivision of the state, including, but not limited to, counties, cities, charter counties, charter cities, charter city and counties, school district, special districts, boards, commissions, the Regents of the University of California, California State University, and agencies thereof. (3) “Pension” or “pension benefits” means a plan or trust providing a pension benefit determined by a formula based on factors such as· age, years of service, and compensation, or a plan or trust

(h) The Legislature may adopt legislation implementing this section and only to further the purposes of this section by a bill passed by rollcall vote entered into the journal, two thirds of the members concurring.

(i) Nothing in this Section shall terminate, amend, modify or in any way affect the retirement benefits or other benefits provided Members of the Legislature pursuant to Section 4.5 of Article IV.

(j) Nothing in this section shall repeal, modify, change or impair the pension benefits of persons who are receiving or are entitled to receive such benefits as a result of that person’s retirement from public agency employment prior to the effective date of this section.

SECTION 4. Severability The provisions of this Act are severable. If any provision of this Act or its application is held invalid, that finding shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

SECTION 5. Effective Date This Act shall become effective immediately upon its approval by the voters pursuant to Section lO(a) of Article 11. No public agency may enter into any employment contract or collective bargaining agreement providing for retirement benefits in excess of the limitations imposed by this Act.

If this goes forward, we got trouble:

UPDATE: A prior post noted the dispute between Gov. Brown and the LAO on his proposal to have CalPERS develop a “hybrid” pension plan. Here is more on that subject: http://calpensions.com/2011/05/24/brown-seeks-hybrid-pension401k-reform-plan/