| | |

Straws in the Wind on External Pension Agitation

From time to time, I post a reminder that the pension reform movement could lead to a state ballot initiative that could override UC’s apparent move to a two-tier plan modeled on Option C. Here are two recent illustrations.

Sanders proposes no pensions for new city hires: New employees would get 401(k) accounts; current workers not affected (excerpt)

By Craig Gustafson

November 19, 2010, San Diego Union-Tribune

Mayor Jerry Sanders has proposed eliminating pensions for new non-public safety hires and giving them 401(k) accounts instead… Sanders said Friday he’ll gather signatures to put a measure before city voters that would eliminate guaranteed pensions for future employees and replace them with 401(k) accounts similar to what many private-sector workers receive. Only police officers and firefighters would continue to receive pensions under the proposed ballot initiative…

The proposed ballot measure is the cornerstone of the mayor’s new approach to the city’s financial woes after the failure of Proposition D, a Nov. 2 measure supported by Sanders that called for a sales tax increase to help balance a $73 million budget deficit and avoid deep cuts to public safety, parks and libraries. “I heard the voters loud and clear. They want definitive solutions to our pension problems,” Sanders said. “While the solution I’m about to propose will not in the near term solve our budget problems, it will ensure we never end up here again.”

…City workers opted out of Social Security in 1982 when then-Mayor Pete Wilson promised the city would provide taxpayer-funded health care for retired workers. Retiree health care ended for new hires in 2005 so if the 401(k) plan is implemented, that would be a new worker’s only source of retirement income…

Full article at http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/nov/19/sanders-proposes-eliminating-city-pensions

– – – – – –

Background: A pension initiative in San Francisco was just defeated. But its chief proponent suggests the campaign for such an initiative will be repeated.

Prop. B: Adachi may yet get pension reform action (excerpt)

C.W. Nevius

November 20, 2010, San Francisco Chronicle

It took more than $2 million, an unlikely coalition and hundreds of volunteers. But in the end, they won. The labor unions, firefighters, police officers and nurses killed Public Defender Jeff Adachi’s city employee pension reform proposition in this month’s election.

Or did they? That clanking you hear is Adachi rising – Terminator-like – from the rubble. With voter anger still fresh over cushy pension payouts, Adachi is uttering three words: “I’ll be back.”

“We are disappointed but not discouraged,” Adachi said this week. “Prop. B redux is definitely in the works.”

…(T)he city can’t afford to let this problem fester. This week Moody’s Investors Service, one of the best known bond rating services in the country, downgraded San Francisco’s rating. Among the comments in the report was this stinger: “The defeat in the election earlier this month of a local pension and health care cost control measure suggests that little near-term fiscal improvement is likely to result from external political pressure.”

“What they are saying is that our budget is held together with rubber bands and string,” Adachi said…

Full article at http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/20/BA5R1GE6T1.DTL

Similar Posts

  • |

    Spotlight on Speech Codes, 2022

    Fire (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) has just released its yearly summary of the state of free speech at 481 public and private colleges and universities in the United States. FIRE defines free speech as “the overwhelming majority of speech protected by the First Amendment.” Few exceptions exist. The survey addresses a wide variety of issues with relevance to free speech, including: Free Speech Zone PoliciesPrior RestraintsSecurity Fee PoliciesPolicies Governing Speakers, Demonstrations, and RalliesPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechInternet Usage PoliciesPolicies on Tolerance, Respect, and CivilityBullying PoliciesThreats and IntimidationHarassmentPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechObscenityIncitement The report is both disappointing…

  • | |

    Academic Senate Rejects New Pension Tier

    Representatives of UC faculty on all campuses delivered a strongly worded rejection of the proposed 2016 pension tier. Reports from the campuses were extensive and overwhelmingly negative (link to PDF). Berkeley faculty called the proposal “imprudent and potentially fiscally irresponsible.” Davis faculty said, “It is a myth that UCRP is too generous,” and went on to detail a long list of likely negative outcomes from the new tier. Irvine faculty noted “the level of disappointment and depth of passion expressed from all quarters about the negative impact that the imposition of the PEPRA cap has on the future of the…

  • |

    Faculty Voice Opposition to Pension Proposal

    On Friday, the UCLA Academic Senate hosted an informational meeting that explained in clear terms that this is a bad, bad plan for faculty. What to do about it was less clear cut. Shane White gave a deeply detailed account of financial aspects of the plan (Slides here: Pension Presentation by Shane White). Among the things we learned: Last year’s budget deal introduced the “PEPRA cap” to UC retirement benefits. This is not a limit on retirement pay-outs, but a cap on the earnings that are used to calculate retirement pay-outs. So any new hire after July 1, 2016 who…

  • | | |

    Pension Changes Proposed: lower benefits, little savings, weaker UCRS

    The University of California will soon have a third pension tier if the Regents approve a plan put forth by the Retirement Options Task Force on Friday. UC President Janet Napolitano charged the Task Force, which included management and Academic Senate representatives, with finding a way to implement her agreement with Gov. Brown to set a cap on pension benefits in exchange for state funds to support the pension system. Over the weekend, as faculty activists read the task force report and a second report produced by Senate leaders (Guide to reviewing the recommendations of the Retirement Options Task Force)…

  • | | |

    The Degradation of Faculty Welfare and Compensation

    Colleen Lye and James Vernon (UC Berkeley Faculty Association) UC faculty need to wake up to the systematic degradation of their pay and benefits.  In 2009, when the salary furlough temporarily cut faculty salaries between 6 and 10%, faculty were outraged.  Yet since then our compensation has been hit by a more serious, and seemingly permanent, double blow. First, despite modest salary rises of 3% and 2% in October 2011 and July 2013, faculty take-home pay has been effectively cut as employee contributions to pension and healthcare have escalated.  Faculty now pay more for retirement and healthcare programs that offer less.  Secondly, faculty are…

  • | | | | | | |

    Listen to Part of the Regents Afternoon Session of 1-22-2014

    As we have noted in numerous prior posts, the Regents refuse to archive their meetings beyond one year.  So we dutifully record the sessions in real time.  Below is a link to part of the afternoon session of Jan. 22.  This segment is mainly the Committee on Educational Policy.  Gov. Brown was in attendance.  We will separately (later) provide links just to certain Brown segments.  But for now, we provide a continuous recording. There was discussion of designating certain areas of UC-Merced as nature reserves, followed by discussion of a new telescope.  The discussion then turned to online ed and…