| | | |

Listen to Audio of Regents Morning Session of 9-13-12

Below is the morning agenda of the Regents.  The audio link at the bottom of this entry is provided only for the open sessions.


Agenda, Thursday, September 13, 2012, Morning
8:30 am Committee of the Whole – Public Comment (open session)
Concerns were expressed by speakers over the discussion at the retreat the day before about taking more out-of-state and international students for budgetary reasons.  Also, a group of law students expressed concern about rising law school tuition.

The Academic Council representatives made in clear they would recommend a tuition increase if Prop 30 – the governor’s tax initiative – doesn’t pass in November.
9:30 am Committee on Long Range Planning (open session)

Discussion on admissions noted that although all UC-eligible undergrads are admitted somewhere in the system, it may not be to the campus of their choice.  It was noted that Riverside now is able to fill its slots from students who want Riverside as their first choice.  So Riverside no longer gets overage from other campuses which are full.  The question was raised about what happens if all the overage goes to Merced.  There was also a presentation by the student regent about student advocacy efforts.  [Editorial comment and hint to student regent: Given the continued general popularity as shown in polling data of Prop 13 of 1978 – the cap on property taxes and requirement of a 2/3 vote for tax increases – it might not be best to “demand” changes in Prop 13 in public forums when the issue at the moment is developing public sympathy for Prop 30.  Prop 13 is not on the November ballot; Prop 30 is.]

9:45 am Committee on Health Services (open session)

There was some discussion about the effect of the new federal health program on student health centers.  Apparently, there was to be a more detailed discussion about the federal health law and the med centers in the closed session.
10:00 am Committee on Health Services (Regents only session)
10:40am Committee on Finance (Regents only session)
11:20am Committee on Compensation (Regents only session)
11:45am Committee on Compensation (closed session)
12:15 pm Board (Regents only session)
12:30 pm Lunch
You can hear the morning session (except the closed portions) at:

Similar Posts

  • | | | |

    UCLA-FA files Unfair Labor Practices charge against UC

    LOS ANGELES, CA (June 5, 2024) – On June 3rd, the UCLA Faculty Association (UCLAFA) filed unfair labor practice (ULP) charges against the University of California (UC) to vindicate faculty rights to protest, organize, and exercise academic freedom. The ULP charges the UC for UCLA’s failure to uphold, and their choice to interfere with, faculty’s legally protected rights during and after the recent UCLA Palestine Solidarity Encampment. This is the fourth organization to file a ULP against the UC in the wake of its actions at UCLA in late April and early May, following charges by UAW, UC-AFT and AFSCME….

  • | | |

    Faculty associations address UCOP

    The UCLA Faculty Association is part of a UC-wide coalition of faculty associations known as CUCFA–the Coalition of UC Faculty Associations. Through CUCFA, UC faculty are able to address the UC Office of the President on issues of importance to faculty, their students, and staff. Below is a round-up of recent communication between CUCFA and UCOP. UC Union Coalition on Health Insurance Costs CUCFA signed on to a joint letter from unions representing employees across the UC system expressing concern with large increases in the cost of health insurance. The unions requested a meeting to “address what appears to be…

  • |

    Report: Affordable Public Higher Education is Possible Today

    A report this week from Reclaim California Higher Education (a coalition of faculty and student groups) makes the case that affordable (even free) higher education is within reach for California. The privatization experiment has failed. The harm to a generation of hard-working, high-aiming young people is proven. It’s time to return to what works: the proven Master Plan for higher education in California. California, with its own resources, can afford to restore top-quality, accessible, affordable college and university opportunity to every qualified student. In fact, Californians can afford nothing less. You can read a summary and download the entire report…

  • | |

    UCOP Response to CUCFA on Health Options

    In April, the Council of UC Faculty Associations drafted a letter of concern over proposed changes to UC employee health insurance options. Over 2,500 faculty system-wide added their names in support of these concerns. Now we have a response from the UC Office of the President (UCOP): Subject: Health care options letter Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 23:40:06 +0000 From: President at UCOP dot edu To: info at cucfa dot org Dear Professor Hays: Thank you for sharing the Council of UC Faculty Associations’ letter of April 7 to President Napolitano regarding the possible restructuring of healthcare plans available to…

  • | | | |

    UCOP Study Shows Decline in Faculty Compensation

    A year ago Colleen Lye and James Vernon, co-chairs of the Berkeley Faculty Association, drew the attention of faculty across the ten campuses of the University of California to the continuing degradation of their pensions, benefits and salaries. Increasing employee contributions to health insurance and pensions were compounding the negative impact of slow salary group, they argued, and retirees faced fewer choices for healthcare. Now UCOP’s own study of total remuneration has confirmed much of their argument. The executive summary of this document contains the following depressing bullet points: Between 2009 and 2014, UC’s total remuneration fell from 2% below…

  • | | |

    The Degradation of Faculty Welfare and Compensation

    Colleen Lye and James Vernon (UC Berkeley Faculty Association) UC faculty need to wake up to the systematic degradation of their pay and benefits.  In 2009, when the salary furlough temporarily cut faculty salaries between 6 and 10%, faculty were outraged.  Yet since then our compensation has been hit by a more serious, and seemingly permanent, double blow. First, despite modest salary rises of 3% and 2% in October 2011 and July 2013, faculty take-home pay has been effectively cut as employee contributions to pension and healthcare have escalated.  Faculty now pay more for retirement and healthcare programs that offer less.  Secondly, faculty are…