Pepper Report Released

The long-awaited UC-Davis pepper spray report has now been released.  A link below will allow you to open the report (which also contains underlying Kroll report on the incident).  Some police officer names have been blanked out although the “pepper spray cop” is named.

Basically, the report suggests an amateur lack of control and decision making of the campus police involving the police chief and chancellor (and others in the chancellor’s office).

President Yudof released the statement below:
Yudof statement on the release of UC Davis pepper-spray report

Date: 2012-04-11
I want to thank Justice Reynoso and members of the Task Force for the long hours and hard work they invested in this effort to fully understand the events of Nov. 18 and to propose remedies that might prevent similar incidents in the future.  My intent now is to give the Task Force report the full and careful reading it deserves, and then, as previously announced, to meet with Chancellor Katehi and discuss her plans going forward for implementing the recommendations.

Even a cursory reading of the report confirms what we have known from the start: Friday, Nov. 18 was a bad day for the UC Davis community and for the entire UC system.  We can and must do better. I look forward to working with Chancellor Katehi to repair the damage caused by this incident and to move this great campus forward.

The release of the Task Force report represents a significant step in that direction, which is why we fought hard in court to ensure that it would be brought into public light in as full and unfettered fashion as possible.  I also am expecting to receive within the next few weeks the results of the expansive effort, led by UC General Counsel Charles Robinson and UC Berkeley School of Law Dean Christopher Edley Jr., to address how we might better approach protest activities on all our campuses.  In closing, I want to reiterate what I stated at the outset of this arduous but necessary process: Free speech, including nonviolent protest, is part of the DNA of this university, and it must be protected with vigilance. I implore students who wish to demonstrate to do so in a peaceful fashion, and I expect campus authorities to honor that right.
A news report on the release is at:
The document is at:

UPDATE: Author of pepper report says Davis chancellor should not resign:
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/04/13/4410834/katehi-urged-to-stay-by-critic.html

The Story So Far: Tuition, Ballot Propositions, Hotel, Japanese Garden, Pepper Spray, and More

Yours truly tried to get a decent recording of the Regents public comment session this morning. Unfortunately, an aging office computer produced such a low quality recording that I will summarize below in writing:

Prior to the public comment period, President Yudof said he intended to endorse the governor’s tax initiative and would ask the Regents to do so.  After the comment period, Academic Council chair Bob Anderson noted that faculty members are voting on a memorial to the Regents asking them to endorse ballot propositions that provide funding to the university.  (The memorial does not designate a particular initiative.)

The initiative proposed by the governor would provide more in the general fund budget, although it officially focuses on K-12 and public safety.  There is a range of forecasts about just how much it would add to budget revenue with the Legislative Analyst having a lower estimate than the governor’s Dept. of Finance.  The governor’s budget has a trigger that would cut UC $200 million if the initiative doesn’t pass.  The trigger, however, is not in the initiative and would have to be enacted by the legislature as part of the 2012-13 budget.

President Yudof said he was continuing discussions with Sacramento about the long-term budget accord for UC but that it hasn’t happened yet.  He said he would like to see in such an accord a tuition increase “buyout” for 2012-13, which seems a very short-term goal to yours truly.  Accords with the state last one fiscal year, if that.

In the actual public comment period students spoke about tuition, about the UC-Riverside student proposal for post-graduation income sharing in lieu of tuition, about budget propositions, etc.  There were angry remarks about the pepper spray incident at UC-Davis and about the UC-Berkeley police confrontation in which some who took part have been banned from campus except to go to class.  There was also a worker grievance aired from UC-San Francisco, but it was unclear what it was about.

In an early post this morning, I provided written comments from a neighbor-hotel owner group opposed to the current plan for the UCLA hotel/conference center.  The speakers basically followed the written document.  A hotel consultant hired to examine the plan generally raised questions about the cost side of the official UCLA business plan which she characterized as underestimated.  Adjusting for debt service and the cost of the parking garage (which UCLA apparently doesn’t intend to pay), the project would be unprofitable until year 20.  A lawyer said bringing the project to the Regents was premature because necessary environmental review under CEQA (a key environmental standard in California) has not been completed.  He also raise questions about the proposed occupancy policy which he suggested would not be eligible for tax-exempt status as the university proposes.  Basically, if there are legal challenges, these are likely to be key issues.

Finally, there was testimony alerting the Regents that members of the Hannah Carter family would be testifying in the public comment period tomorrow in opposition to the UCLA sale of the Japanese Garden.

President Yudof Responds to Three Pension Questions

On March 2, President Yudof answered questions in a live-streaming format from UC employees.  You may have received an email referring to an edited version of some questions – including three on pensions – that appeared in UCLA Today.  Because the UCLA Today versions were edited, some nuances on pension issues were lost.

Below is the UCLA Today version in regular type and then a comment from yours truly and the actual transcript in italics.  Also, the audio (a video with a fixed picture) is at the bottom of this posting along with various links.


Question: What is the impact of Governor Brown’s pension reform on our UC retirement benefits?
Yudof: The governor’s proposal actually shares many characteristics with what has already been approved for the University of California Retirement Plan.  Employees would pay more under the governor’s proposal. Ours remains wholly a pension plan, not even partially a defined contribution or 401(K)-type plan. And one major difference is, ours is in place; his is not. And I’ve said that to him.  The way the governor’s proposal is currently constructed, it would seem to apply to everyone, but I just can’t believe they would try to push this for the University of California where, for better or worse, we seem to have settled these issues. What would be the point? I predict it’s not going to happen to UC employees, but we’ll be watchful.

Comment: His actual remarks indicate that the issue at UC has been settled for a couple of yearswhich could that there may be a revisiting of the issue thereafter.  The text is ambiguous.

Here is the literal transcript:

PENNY HERBERT:  So this is an interesting one, again around the statehouse: help me understand what the impact of Governor Brown’s pension reform is and how does that threaten my retirement at the University of California?

PRESIDENT MARK YUDOF:  Well this is a little hard to predict.  The Governor’s proposal actually shares many characteristics with what has already been approved for the University of California.

PENNY HERBERT:  Yeah.

PRESIDENT MARK YUDOF:  The employees would pay more, there’d be a new tier.  But it has other characteristics which we did not incorporate.  That is, ours remains wholly a defined benefit plan, not even partially a defined contribution plan.  We do not — it was in one of the earlier that you asked, but we do not deduct social security payments.  The feeling was that was too regressive.  It hurt our lowest income employees, lower income employees than most.  It does have all those elements and one major difference is, ours is in place; his is not.  And I’ve said that to him.  The way it’s currently being constructed, it would seem to apply to everyone but I just can’t believe they would try to push this for the University of California where for better or worse, we seem to have settled these issues for a couple of years.  You know, what would be the point?  So what I can say is we’re vigilant, we’re watching, we’re very alert to this, taken literally it would have an impact.  It would reduce the benefits in the new tier — not so much — and actually it would cost more in the present tier.  That’s another — the present employees but I predict it’s not going to happen to UC employees but again, we’ll be watchful.

Question: Will there be a maximum cap for the employee contribution to the UC retirement plan? What’s going to happen over the next couple of years? 
Yudof: That’s hard to know. We’re hitting it pretty hard and I feel badly about it because, de facto, it’s a pay cut. On the other hand, the last thing in the world I want is for your retirement not to be there when you retire.

Comment: In his actual remarks, he says that the governor’s notion of a 50-50 split of contributions to the pension is too harsh, i.e., the employee share should be smaller.  He talks about the employee contribution going to 6% and maybe 7%.  In the past, the Academic Senate has viewed 7% as a cap but various projections made for the Regents appear to have the employee share going to 8%.  Contributions are already scheduled at 6.5%.

Here is the literal transcript:

PENNY HERBERT:  And just for the audience out there, we will be answering more of these questions on our Web site and on this site.  So if some of them didn’t have the detail you wish, if you want to ask them again through the Staff Advisor Web site, but also look for postings of the commonly asked questions after the fact.  So I have another question that might be looking into a crystal ball again.  Will there be a maximum cap for the employee contribution to the UC retirement plan?  What’s going to happen over the next couple of years?

PRESIDENT MARK YUDOF:   That’s hard to know.  We’re hitting it pretty hard and I feel badly about it because, you know, de facto it’s a pay cut.  You know?  That’s just what it is.  There’s no other way to slice it.  On the other hand, the last thing in the world I want is for the money — for your retirement not to be there when you retire.  And we didn’t make contributions, you didn’t make contributions and the University didn’t for 20 years.  The — all I’ll say is this, the Governor’s proposal has a 50/50 split between the employer and employee.  I think that’s too harsh on our employees so I don’t know if there’s a cap but I think that really is way too harsh for present employees in a context where you’re not getting year in, year out merit raises and cost of living adjustments. So we’ll see what happens. It’ll probably — I’m guessing it’ll probably go to six percent or maybe even seven but I’d be real reluctant to push it any harder unless we had some real salary relief for the staff.

Question: Given that private sector employees pay much more to their retirement, doesn’t it make sense to consider moving to a 401(K)-type vehicle?
Yudof: I have a couple of reactions. First, we can’t do that for existing employees certainly without their consent, just as a legal matter. So we’re locked in for the vast bulk of people to a defined benefit program. Second, we probably have some subset of employees who would prefer something like a defined contribution, 401(K), and I’m willing to look at that.  The third thing is I am one of the skeptics of 401(K)s. People by and large have not been very good at managing these things. There are some skilled people who have been very good, but I think I’m not one of those people. And I want to be real careful. It is paternalistic, but I think many employees would prefer to have the pros do the investing. And if they don’t, that’s fine — they can take it on, but I don’t know that it’s good fit for everyone.

Comment: The actual remarks show somewhat more receptivity to defined contribution than the text above.  Some groups might prefer defined contribution and UC is willing to talk about it.

Here is the literal transcript:

PENNY HERBERT:  We have a couple of minutes left so we’ll go to a couple of your questions, Zach.

ZACH:  Great, I’d be glad to do that.  So this I believe speaks to sort of the breath and passion that our employees, our staff have towards their retirements and their retirement plan so here’s another that we might not have specifically talked to yet.  Given that private sector employees pay much more to their retirement, doesn’t it make sense to consider moving to a 401(K) type vehicle?  What do you say to that?

PRESIDENT MARK YUDOF:  I have a couple of reactions.  First we can’t do that for existing employees certainly without their consent, just as a legal matter. So we’re locked in for the vast bulk of people to a defined benefit program and so forth.  Second, we probably have some subsets of employees who would prefer something like a defined contribution, 401(K) and I’m willing to look at that. You know, for example, when we have negotiations with the unions, we have to keep our costs consistent with the non-represented employees but there may be some things they want that are different and I don’t know that they would want a defined – part defined contribution.  Maybe they’d still like defined benefit. But we’d be happy to talk about that with them.  The third thing is I am one of the skeptics of 401(K)s.  I have to say that I read a lot of behavioral economics.  And people by and large have not been very good in managing these things.  It’s just true.  There are some skilled people who have been very good but I think I’m one of those people.  You know?  I don’t know which stocks and I make an investment, I forget what it’s in and all.  So I just do index funds and (sic – should be “in”) my other retirement.   And I want to be real careful.  It is paternalistic but I think many employees would prefer to have the pros do the investing and if they don’t, that’s fine.  They can take it on but I don’t know that that’s good fit for everyone.

Audio of the three pension questions can be heard below:

No smoking at UC by 2014

The University of California will ban smoking and chewing tobacco on all 10 campuses within two years, President Mark Yudof told campus chancellors this week.  Nearly 600 other campuses nationwide have banned smoking, and many California universities either limit smokers to isolated parts of campus or keep them from lighting up at all.

…The university likely would have banned smoking earlier, but smokers vehemently argued against it, said Trish Ratto, a health educator and manager of UC Berkeley’s Health Matters Wellness Program.  The university will implement the ban in stages to help smokers quit gradually rather go cold turkey.  By 2014, however, nobody — students, professors, custodians or conference attendees — will be allowed to smoke or chew tobacco on campus…

UC Excerpt from Dec. 14 Legislative Pepper Spray Hearing

As readers of this blog are aware, an incident in which student demonstrators at UC-Davis sparked concerns and received wide public attention. A joint legislative hearing was held on December 14. Below is an audio of the testimony of UC president Mark Yudof and General Counsel Charles Robinson at the “Legislative Hearing on California University Campus Police Policy.”

The excerpts include the formal statements of the two witnesses from UC plus a question and answer session which followed similar testimony by CSU witnesses. The main information to be found in these excerpts is that there is likely to be a UC-systemwide policy about police activity that comes out of the various reviews. March 1, 2012 was given as the probable date in which the findings/outcomes would be released. Note that there are occasional silent pauses due to interruptions in streaming. President Yudof indicated he found no conflict of interest involved in the choice of former LA Police Chief William Bratton to conduct an investigation. Some legislators expressed concern about what they perceived as a large number of independently-conducted investigations going on at UC. Links are below:

Part 1:
 
Part 2:
 
Part 3:
 
Alternative audio link of full excerpt (not divided into parts):

Note 1: The CSU portions were largely edited out although some elements remain since they were part of the general discussion.
Note 2: Full video of the hearings is available in three parts from CalChannel. The excerpts here are from parts 1 and 2. It is not known how long CalChannel will retain the hearings online. There are 3 links at:

http://www.calchannel.com/channel/viewVideo/3196

http://www.calchannel.com/channel/viewVideo/3197

Another Hint of Discussions with the State Behind Closed Doors on Multiyear Tuition Increase Deal

The text below in italics is from UC President Yudof’s Facebook page. As noted in a prior post on this blog, there are hints of a multiyear-tuition-increase/steady-budget-support-from-the-state being discussed behind closed doors with Brown administration officials. See the bold print below.

We are extremely disappointed that UC is faced with yet another significant State budget reduction: the $100 million “trigger cut” just announced. This additional cut will exacerbate the fiscal challenges the University faces in the current year and place additional stress on the quality of education provided to UC students. While the $650 million cut to UC enacted by the State last June resulted in additional tuition hikes for our students, let me assure you there are no 2011-12 mid-year tuition increases planned.

Over the past several years, cuts to higher education by the Governor and the Legislature have had a severe impact on students, their families, faculty and staff. The University has consistently objected to additional mid-year cuts, and while we certainly understand the ongoing fiscal challenges the State faces, we are requesting that this latest reduction be considered a one-time cut to UC’s budget and not made a permanent reduction. We will ask to have this funding restored to UC at the beginning of the next fiscal year (July 1, 2012).

In the current economic environment, marked by a huge State deficit and a limited revenue stream, we recognize that the Governor is in the eye of a “perfect storm.”

As we draw closer to the 2012-13 State budget release in January, however, we are asking the Governor to refrain from any additional cuts to higher education. Faculty and staff have sacrificed, and our students in particular have given more than their fair share.

Moreover, as we move forward, we will continue to work closely with State officials to develop a long-term revenue plan that will give the University much-needed financial stability.

This has been a challenging year for the University of California. I understand the concerns that many in the UC community have voiced over the recent incidents surrounding student protests on some of our campuses. I assure you that a thorough review of these incidents is in progress. I am making every effort possible to protect our long-held traditions of free speech and peaceful protests. During these difficult times, I ask you not to lose sight of our common goals—to make public higher education a priority and to keep a UC education accessible and affordable for Californians.

Thank you for your continued support for the University of California and best wishes for a happy holiday season.

Sincerely yours,

Mark G. Yudof

President

University of California

From http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150425120888379

One problem with this strategy is that a handshake deal between the UC president and the governor on a “compact” reached behind closed doors did not work out well under Schwarzenegger. The governor cannot appropriate funds; only the legislature can. To make such a deal work, there needs to be wider participation including the legislature, the Legislative Analyst, major interest groups, etc.

It would be nice to know what is going on behind the door:

Our earlier post on this subject is at http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/12/buried-lede-uc-reviving-multiyear.html

Yet More Pepper: Legislative Hearings Tomorrow

UC, CSU Officials To Join Experts and Students In Testifying At State Capitol Hearing On Campus Protests

Sacramento, CA–University of California system President Mark Yudof and UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi will join other UC and California State University officials, police oversight experts and student representatives in testifying before a Dec. 14 joint legislative hearing looking into UC and CSU system-wide policies and procedures regarding non-violent protests and campus police use-of-force rules.

Assemblymember Marty Block (AD-78), chair of the Assembly Higher Education Committee and Senator Alan Lowenthal (SD-27), chair of the Senate Education Committee, have called the hearing in response to a number of incidents at UC Davis and UC Berkeley where peaceful student protesters were doused with pepper spray and battered with batons by UC campus police officers.

“It is the responsibility of the university to provide a safe environment for our students to learn and participate in activities on campus,” Block said. “It is also the responsibility of the university to foster a climate that promotes free expression of ideas on campus. We as the legislature must ensure that the proper procedures are in place to protect both campus safety and student free speech.”

“Something is wrong with a system where our children and students, struggling peacefully to have their voices heard, are answered by the spray of chemical weapons and the sting of a truncheon. It is imperative that we have a unified policy on the appropriate response to peaceful campus protests and on the use of force by campus police,” Lowenthal said.

Set to testify before the committee on use-of-force policies, procedures and response are Barbara Attard, a recognized expert on civilian oversight of police agencies and representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union.

Offering testimony on UC and CSU system-wide policies and procedures regarding campus demonstrations are CSU Executive Vice Chancellor Ben Quillian and CSU chief law enforcement officer Nate Johnson.

UC Davis Chancellor Katehi and CSU Fresno President John Welty will testify on specific campus policies and procedures regarding use of force against demonstrators.

In addition, the respective presidents of the UC Student Association and CSU Associated Students will speak on the policies and procedures that are followed by student groups when organizing demonstrations.

The hearing will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Dec. 14, 2011 in Room 4203 of the State Capitol.

Source: http://asmdc.org/members/a78/news-room/press-releases/item/2860-uc-csu-officials-to-join-experts-and-students-in-testifying-at-state-capitol-hearing-on-campus-protests

Maybe we should put some limits on this thing:

Update: Brouhaha reported about UC-Riverside rules concerning demonstrations which may (or may not) be timed for the Regents meeting on that campus in January. See Inside Higher Ed article at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/14/uc-riverside-protest-guidelines-trouble-students-faculty

Update: UC-Riverside suspends new rules http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2011/12/15/uc-riverside-pulls-guidelines-protests

Update: News account of hearing at http://www.sacbee.com/2011/12/15/4123764/more-student-unrest-likely-california.html

President’s Pepper Panel Named

President names members of task force

Date: 2011-12-05

Contact: UC Office of the President

Phone: (510) 987-9200

OAKLAND — University of California President Mark G. Yudof today (Monday, Dec. 5) appointed 12 students, faculty, alumni and staff members to serve on a task force formed to investigate the Nov. 18 pepper-spraying incident at the University of California, Davis.

As previously announced, the task force will be headed by former California Supreme Court Justice Cruz Reynoso, a professor emeritus at the UC Davis School of Law.

Most task force members are affiliated with UC Davis and were nominated by relevant campus organizations.

Yudof commissioned the task force as part of a response to a request from UC Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi that the UC Office of the President investigate the incident, in which campus demonstrators were pepper-sprayed by campus police.

Two officers and the campus chief of police have been placed on administrative leave in the wake of the incident.

“My intent in forming this task force is to allow the UC Davis community to take a fair and uncompromising look at what happened on Nov. 18,” Yudof said, “and also to make any recommendations it deems appropriate in light of its independent review of the facts.”

The work of the task force will begin upon delivery of a fact-finding report of the incident that is being developed by outside investigators from Kroll Consulting, a firm internationally renowned for its expertise in police procedures.

The Kroll report is expected to be delivered to Yudof, Katehi and the task force in early January at the latest.

The task force will review the findings and, based on available information, assign responsibility for the events of Nov. 18.

Yudof said the task force also is expected to make “recommendations to me and to Chancellor Katehi regarding improvements to police procedures, command protocols and campus policies and oversight structures that will help ensure that the rights and safety of nonviolent protestors and the entire campus community are protected.”

In addition to Justice Reynoso, Yudof identified members of the task force as follows:

· Patrick Blacklock, Yolo County administrator and immediate past-chair, Cal Aggie Alumni Association.

· Peter Blando, business services manager, Office of the Vice Provost-Information and Educational Technology, UC Davis, and past chair, UC Davis Staff Assembly (nominated by the UC Davis Staff Assembly).

· Alan Brownstein, professor, School of Law, UC Davis (nominated by the Academic Senate).

· Tatiana Bush, undergraduate student and former Associated Students senator (nominated by the Associated Students of UC Davis).

· Daniel M. Dooley, senior vice president, external relations, UC Office of the President and designated systemwide administrator for whistleblower complaints; alumnus, UC Davis.

· Penny Herbert, manager, Department of Clinical Operations, UC Davis, and staff advisor to the UC Board of Regents.

· Kathryn Kolesar, chair, UC Davis Graduate Student Association (nominated by the Graduate Student Association).

· William McKenna, law student, UC Davis (nominated by the Law Students Association).

· Carolyn Penny, director in International Law Programs and principal and mediator, Common Ground Center for Cooperative Solutions, UC Davis Extension (nominated by the UC Davis Academic Federation).

· Eric Rauchway, professor, Department of History, UC Davis (nominated by the Academic Senate).

· Judy Sakaki, vice president, student affairs, UC Office of the President and former vice chancellor for student affairs, UC Davis.

· Rebecca Sterling, undergraduate student and former Associated Students senator (nominated by the Associated Students of UC Davis).

From: http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/26764

Who knows what the task force might find?

Many Faculty Send Open Letter to Chancellor Block Concerning “Occupy” Demonstration/Related Developments

The letter below appears on the blog https://uclafacultyunited.wordpress.com/ in an entry dated Nov. 20.

Open Letter to Chancellor Block

November 20, 2011

Dear Chancellor Block:

In the predawn darkness this past Friday, a large contingent of police arrived on campus to remove a group of students who were peacefully protesting tuition increases, student loan debt, and the collapse of public funding for the University of California. In an act of civil disobedience, 14 students chose to ignore an order to disperse and were arrested.

Their crime, formally, was to violate a campus policy against camping. But in reality they were arrested for engaging in political speech at a time and in a manner that did not please the campus administration. For this political action, they may face disciplinary proceedings.

As UCLA faculty we call on you, to drop any charges that may be pending against these students. The freedom to debate controversial topics is at the core of university life. The students occupying Wilson Plaza on Thursday night were not posing a health or safety risk. They were not disrupting the educational mission of the university. They were holding ongoing discussions—what they call a “general assembly”—to share information and experiences, and decide together how to face the future.

So far UCLA has avoided the bitter conflicts between campus police and students that we have seen at Berkeley and Davis. However, you will recall that in 2009 UCLA Police engaged in questionable use of force that injured students and triggered an internal review. While different people may have different perceptions of the Review’s conclusions about the use of force in 2009, no one would disagree with their reaffirmation that “[w]hen members of the university community peaceably assemble to challenge some aspect of University governance, their rights to advocacy must be respected.” (44)

We have a chance to find another path at UCLA. As UCLA’s own “Principles of Community” declare, “We are committed to ensuring freedom of expression and dialogue, in a respectful and civil manner, on the spectrum of views held by our varied and diverse campus communities.” As anyone visiting the protest site can attest, the protesters were upholding their end of this charge—far better than we see in most of the political debate in this country. To stifle their voice would shortchange the future. At both Davis and Berkeley, campus police have deployed deplorable violence and injured students and faculty. On both campuses, police introduced violence while students, staff, and faculty were engaged in peaceable protest. We call on you to ensure that UCLA does not follow in their footsteps and fail to uphold the principles for which the University stands.

We urge you to drop all charges and disciplinary proceedings against the students arrested in Wilson Plaza, and also to respect students’ rights to protest the pressing issues of our political, social, and educational life.

Sincerely,

Tobias Higbie Associate Professor of History; Michael Meranze, Professor of History; Jenny Sharpe, Professor of English and Women’s Studies; Michelle Clayton, Assoc Prof Comp Lit & Spanish & Portuguese; Chris Looby, Professor English; Nouri Gana, Assoc Prof Comparative Literature; Jan de Leeuw; Distinguished Professor and Chair, UCLA Department of Statistics; Joseph Bristow, Professor English; Saree Makdisi, Professor English; Steven Nelson, Associate Professor of African and African American Art History; Carole H. Browner, Professor Anthropology; Jeffrey Prager, Professor of Sociology; Jessica R. Cattelino, Associate Professor of Anthropology; Jack Chen, Associate Professor Asian Languages & Cultures; David Delgado Shorter, Associate Professor World Arts & Cultures; Noah Zatz, Professor of Law; Katherine King, Professor Comparative Literature; Matthew Fischer, Assistant Professor English; Gerry A. Hale, Emeritus professor, Geography Department; Peter McLaren, Professor, Graduate school of Education and Information Studies; Michael Cooperson, Associate Professor NELC; Andrea Goldman, Assistant Professor History; George Baker, Associate Professor of Modern and Contemporary Art; Allen F. Roberts, World Arts & Cultures/Dance; Susan Curtiss, Professor Emeritus, Linguistics; Henry A. Hespenheide, Professor Emeritus of Ecology; Kathleen A. McHugh, Professor, Department of English, Cinema and Media Studies Program; Valerie Matsumoto, Professor, History and Asian American Studies; Sondra Hale, Professor, Anthropology and Women’s Studies; Elizabeth DeLoughrey, Associate Professor, English; Stephen Yenser, Distinguished Professor, Department of English; Robert Brenner, Professor of History; Vinay Lal, Associate Professor of History; Sharon Traweek, Associate Professor of Women’s Studies and History; Susan Slyomovics, Professor of Anthropology and Near Eastern Languages & Cultures; Susan L. Foster, Distinguished Professor, Department of World Arts and Cultures/Dance; Teofilo Ruiz, Professor of History, Spanish & Portuguese; Rafael Perez-Torres, Professor of English; Jason Throop, Associate Professor, Anthropology; Kenneth L. Karst, Price Professor of Law Emeritus; Susan Plann, Professor of Applied Linguistics and Spanish & Portuguese; Alex Purves, Associate Professor of Classics; Helen Deutsch, Professor of English; Yogita Goyal, Associate Professor of English; Michael Salman, Associate Professor of History; Jan Reiff, Associate Professor of History; Chris Tilly, Professor of Urban Planning; Grace Hong, Associate Professor Women’s Studies and Asian American Studies; Lowell Gallagher, Associate Professor English; Arthur Little, Associate Professor English; Carollee Howes, Professor Education; A. J. Julius, Assistant Professor of Philosophy; Robin Lauren Derby, Associate Professor of History; Jonathan H. Grossman, Associate Professor of English; Robert N. Watson, Distinguished Professor of English; Andrew Apter, Professor of History & Anthropology; Calvin Normore, Professor of Philosophy; Victor Bascara, Associate Professor of Asian American Studies; Ching Kwan Lee, Professor of Sociology; Francoise Lionnet, Professor of French and Francophone Studies; John McCumber, Professor of Germanic Languages; Juliet Williams, Associate Professor of Women’s Studies; Jorge Marturano, Assistant Professor of Spanish and Portuguese; Peter Lunenfeld, Professor of Design Media Arts; Ruben Hernandez-Leon, Associate Professor of Sociology; Douglas Kellner, George F. Kneller Chair in the Philosophy of Education; Héctor Calderón, Professor, Spanish and Portuguese; Sandra Harding, Professor of Education; Barbara Fuchs, Professor of English and Spanish and Portuguese; Michael Chwe, Associate Professor, Political Science; Michelle Erai, Assistant Prof. Women’s Studies; Felicity Nussbaum, Professor of English; Mishuana Goeman, Assistant Professor of Women’s Studies; Sherry Ortner, Distinguished Professor of Anthropology; Anurima Banerji, Assistant Professor, Department of World Arts and Cultures; Laure Murat, Associate Professor of French & Francophone Studies; Shane Butler, Professor of Classics; Elizabeth Upton, Assistant Professor of Musicology; Sorin Popa, Professor of Mathematics; Elizabeth Marchant, Associate Professor of Women’s Studies; King-Kok Cheung, Professor of English and Asian Am Studies; Zrinka Stahuljak, Associate Professor of French & Francophone Studies; James Gelvin, Professor of History; David N. Myers, Professor of History; John Dagenais, Professor of Spanish and Portuguese; Timothy Taylor, Professor of Ethnomusicology/Musicology; Gary Blasi, Professor of Law; Barbara Herman, Professor of Philosophy; Joanna Schwartz, Acting Professor of Law; Thu-huong Nguyen-vo, Associate Professor, Asian Languages and Cultures and Asian American Studies; Namhee Lee, Associate Professor of Asian Languages & Cultures; John Carriero, Professor of Philosophy; Brian Kim Stefans, Assistant Professor of English; George Dutton, Associate Professor of Asian Languages and Cultures; Samuel Cumming, Assistant Professor of Philosophy & Law; Sheldon Smith, Associate Professor of Philosophy; Gil Hochberg, Associate Professor of Comparative Literature; Mark Sawyer Professor of Political Science; Karen Brodkin, Professor Emerita of Anthropology and Women’s Studies; Andrea Fraser, Professor of Art; Chon Noriega, Professor of Film, Television, and Digital Media; Peter Peterson, Professor of Mathematics; Chris Chism, Associate Professor of English; Victoria Marks, Professor, World Arts and Cultures|Dance; Kathleen L. Komar, Professor of Comparative Literature & German; Richard Elman, Professor of Mathematics; John Papadopoulos, Professor of Classics; Dana Cuff, Professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Design; Natasha Heller, Assistant Professor of Asian Languages and Cultures; Carlos Alberto Torres, Professor of Social Sciences and Comparative Education; César J. Ayala Professor of Sociology; Ghislaine Lydon, Associate Professor in History; Cameron Campbell, Professor of Sociology; William Roy, Professor of Sociology; Jerome Rabow, Prof. Emeritus, Sociology; Nicky Hart, Professor of Sociology; Darnell M. Hunt, Professor of Sociology; Phillip Bonacich, Department of Sociology; Stefan Timmermans, Professor of Sociology; Miguel M. Unzueta, Assistant Professor, Anderson-HROB; Alan Garfinkel, Professor of Medicine; Patricia Gandara, Professor of Education; Joel F. Handler, Professor, UCLA School of Law; Michael Heim, Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures/Comparative Literature; David Lopez, Professor Emeritus of Sociology; Gail Kligman, Professor of Sociology; Maylei Blackwell, Assistant Professor of Chicana and Chicano Studies; David Gieseker, Professor of Mathematics; Lyle F. Bachman, Professor, Department of Applied Linguistics; Pamela Munro, Distinguished Professor of Linguistics; Aisha Finch, Assistant Professor of Women’s Studies and Afro-American Studies; Tova Brown, Assistant Adjunct Professor of Mathematics; James Ralston, Professor of Mathematics; Walter Ponce, Professor of Music; Joshua Foa Dienstag, Professor of Political Science; Olga T. Yokoyama, Professor Department of Applied Linguistics; Abel Valenzuela Jr., Professor of Chicana and Chicano Studies; Catherine Opie, Professor of Art; Richard J Jackson, Professor of Environmental Health Science; Steven P. Wallace, Professor, Department of Community Health Sciences; Inwon C. Kim, Associate Professor of Mathematics; Otto Santa Ana, Associate Professor Department of Chicana/o Studies; Dwight W. Read, Distinguished Professor of Anthropology; Kelly Lytle Hernandez, Associate Professor of History; Christopher Erickson, Professor of Management; Maia Young, Assoc Prof of Human Resources and Organizational Behavior, Anderson School of Management; Jody Kreiman, Professor of Surgery; Michael J. B. Allen, Distinguished Professor of English; Stephen Cederbaum, M.D. Professor Emeritus, Psychiatry, Pediatrics and Human Genetics; Ali Behdad, Professor of English and Comparative Literature

The blog post contains directions for those faculty members wishing to sign the letter above:

Email uclafacultyunited@gmail.com. Subject line: add my name. Put your name, rank and department in the body of the email message.

Bruin article on letter at:

http://www.dailybruin.com/index.php/article/2011/11/more_than_40_faculty_condemn_arrests_of_occupy_ucla_protesters_in_letter_to_chancellor_block

===

Other developments:

UC-Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi announced tonight that she is calling for all charges against 10 individuals in last Friday’s pepper spray incident – nine of them students – to be dropped, and that the university will pay the medical expenses of students injured by campus police using pepper spray… UC President Mark Yudoff announced that he had appointed Will Bratton, the former head of police departments in Los Angeles, Boston and New York, to conduct an independent review of Friday’s (UC-Davis) incident

Full story at http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/22/4074483/university-offers-to-pay-medical.html

Interview with UC-Davis chancellor by student TV:

Note: The postponed Regents meeting will take place Nov. 28 through a teleconference at various campuses. At UCLA, the location is the James West Alumni Center. The meeting begins at 8:30 AM.

Official statement from President Yudof:

President Yudof launches initiatives to address policing and protests

Date: 2011-11-22
Contact: University of California Office of the President
Phone: (510) 987-9200

University of California President Mark G. Yudof moved on two fronts today (Tuesday, Nov. 22) to address policing issues in the wake of the pepper spraying of UC Davis students and other incidents involving law enforcement officers and protesters.

Acting in response to a written request from UC Davis Chancellor Linda P.B. Katehi, Yudof agreed to conduct a thorough review of the events of Nov. 18 on the Davis campus.

As a first step, Yudof reached out to former Los Angeles police chief William J. Bratton to undertake an independent fact-finding of the pepper spray incident and report back the results to him within 30 days.

Bratton, who also led the New York City police department, now heads the New York-based Kroll consulting company as chairman. He also is a renowned expert in progressive community policing.

“My intent,” Yudof said, “is to provide the Chancellor and the entire University of California community with an independent, unvarnished report about what happened at Davis.”

Assembly Speaker John A. Perez also had made a request to President Yudof and UC Regents Chair Sherry Lansing for an independent investigation.

Under the plan, Bratton’s report also will be presented to an advisory panel that Yudof is forming, again at Katehi’s request. The panel will consist of a cross-section of students, faculty, staff and other UC community members.

The advisory panel, whose members will be announced at a later date, will review the report and make recommendations to Chancellor Katehi on steps that should be taken to ensure the safety of peaceful protesters on campus. She will present her implementation plan to President Yudof.

On a second track, Yudof appointed UC General Counsel Charles Robinson and UC Berkeley School of Law Dean Christopher Edley Jr. to lead a system-wide examination of police protocols and policies as they apply to protests at all 10 UC campuses.

This effort will include visits to campuses for discussions with students, faculty and staff, and consultation with an array of experts.

The review is expected to result in recommended best practices for policing protests across the 10 UC campuses.

“With these actions,” Yudof said, “we are moving forward to identify what needs to be done to ensure the safety of students and others who engage in non-violent protests on UC campuses. The right to peaceful protest on all of our campuses must be protected.”

Source: http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/26712

Earlier posts on this topic:

http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/11/another-pepper-apology-lets-focus.html

http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/11/uc-davis-pepper-spray-controversy.html

http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/11/yudof-issues-statement-on-events-at-uc.html

http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/11/campus-demonstrations-recent-back-in.html

http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2011/11/ucla-recent-history-nov-9-demonstration.html

Further update: Email from chancellor and EVC of 11-23-11 below. Note that it says that UCLA will consult with the LA city attorney about the arrests of demonstrators. It does not say what it will be asking the city attorney to do.

————————————————–

Office of the Chancellor
Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost

To the Campus Community:

The images from events at UCB and UCD have shocked and troubled all of us on campus and across the system. Our hearts go out to the students, parents, faculty and staff at Berkeley and Davis during this trying time.

At UCLA, a small number of protesters identifying themselves as the Occupy UCLA movement established a camp last Thursday and were asked to disperse early Friday morning. They refused to disperse and preferred to be arrested. All the protesters that morning were peaceful and cooperative. The police worked with Student Affairs and the students to ensure that the process went forward smoothly and the encampment was removed without confrontation or injury. On Monday, after the actions at Davis, the protesters held a series of teach-ins, and decided to set up tents on the lawn in front of the Morgan Center. Under the circumstances and at the urging of faculty and the Senate leadership, we decided not to intervene. Today they have dismantled their tents on their own accord.

The peace and safety of the campus is a high concern for us, as is the freedom of expression. Our aim is to achieve both in a time when feelings are running extremely high. We have worked closely with Student Affairs, Legal Affairs, and UCLA PD to ensure that the campus adheres to our principles of community and that everyone acts with restraint, respect, and tolerance in all circumstances. The meeting of the Regents at UCLA this coming Monday may bring demonstrations, and we will work strenuously with all parties to ensure as far as we are able that they remain safe and peaceful. We have been in constant discussion with our students and campus leadership, and have stressed firmly that we all must act in a responsible manner that preserves the core values of the campus.

We are pleased that so far the UCLA community has managed to avoid the kinds of wrenching events that have torn our sister campuses. That we have done so is testimony to the civility and restraint shown by our students, faculty, police, and staff in difficult circumstances.

We will consult with the City Attorney next week concerning the charges against our students.

We wish you all a happy and safe Thanksgiving.

Gene D. Block
Chancellor

Scott L. Waugh
Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost

——-

And there are complaints about the Bratton investigation:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-uc-davis-20111124,0,1010444.story


Yudof on Berkeley and Davis Incidents

Note: See prior blog entries on the “Occupy” incidents at Davis and Berkeley. Links at bottom of this posting.
President Yudof responds to campus protest issues

Contact: UC Office of the President

Phone: (510) 987-9157

University of California President Mark G. Yudof today (Nov. 20) announced the actions he is taking in response to recent campus protest issues:

I am appalled by images of University of California students being doused with pepper spray and jabbed with police batons on our campuses.

I intend to do everything in my power as president of this university to protect the rights of our students, faculty and staff to engage in non-violent protest.

Chancellors at the UC Davis and UC Berkeley campuses already have initiated reviews of incidents that occurred on their campuses. I applaud this rapid response and eagerly await the results.

The University of California, however, is a single university with 10 campuses, and the incidents in recent days cry out for a systemwide response.

Therefore I will be taking immediate steps to set that response in motion.

I intend to convene all 10 chancellors, either in person or by telephone, to engage in a full and unfettered discussion about how to ensure proportional law enforcement response to non-violent protest.

To that end, I will be asking the chancellors to forward to me at once all relevant protocols and policies already in place on their individual campuses, as well as those that apply to the engagement of non-campus police agencies through mutual aid agreements.

Further, I already have taken steps to assemble experts and stakeholders to conduct a thorough, far-reaching and urgent assessment of campus police procedures involving use of force, including post-incident review processes.

My intention is not to micromanage our campus police forces. The sworn officers who serve on our campuses are professionals dedicated to the protection of the UC community.

Nor do I wish to micromanage the chancellors. They are the leaders of our campuses and they have my full trust and confidence.

Nonetheless, the recent incidents make clear the time has come to take strong action to recommit to the ideal of peaceful protest.

As I have said before, free speech is part of the DNA of this university, and non-violent protest has long been central to our history. It is a value we must protect with vigilance. I implore students who wish to demonstrate to do so in a peaceful and lawful fashion. I expect campus authorities to honor that right.

TV report on the Davis aftermath:

See earlier posts on Occupy demonstrations at UC:

Recent Tweets:

mark_yudof Mark G. Yudof

I intend to do everything in my power as President to protect the rights of our students, faculty & staff to engage in non-violent protest.

mark_yudof Mark G. Yudof

I am appalled by images of University of California students being doused with pepper spray and jabbed with police batons on our campuses.

Update 11/21/11: The UC-Davis police chief has been placed on leave:

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/21/4070465/uc-davis-police-chief-placed-on.html

and there is this about one of the police officers put on leave:

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/21/4070831/uc-davis-cop-believed-to-have.html

Further update:

Even as student protests spread across the state this fall – with national attention focused today on the pepper spraying of nonviolent protesters at UC Davis – Gov. Jerry Brown has kept silent…

Full story at: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/11/jerry-brown-silent-on-davis-incident-student-protests.html

Note: Those who know California political history will know that Jerry Brown – determined not to be like his father who got blamed for demonstrations at Berkeley – got his start as a public figure being tough on student demonstrations as a member of a community college board.