uc retirement

|

CalPERS sticks to assumed rate of return above UC’s

A prior post noted that CalPERS might lower its assumed rate of return on investment to 7.5%, the same as UCRP. What CalPERS might have done would have had no direct effect on UC, but it would have deprived us of being the more conservative. Now that won’t happen, according to the press release below:CalPERS Discount Rate Unchanged Press Release March 15, 2011 External Affairs BranchPatricia K. Macht, DirectorBrad Pacheco, Chief, Office of Public AffairsContact: Edward Fong, Information Officer CalPERS Discount Rate Unchanged Assumed Investment Return Rate to Stay at 7.75 Percent SACRAMENTO, CA – A key committee of the…

| | | | | |

Pension train may roll through UC’s pension changes. Does anyone at UCOP even know where that train is?

As noted in earlier posts, the pension train is rolling in Sacramento and could easily override the changes in UCRP made by the Regents last December. Is anyone from UCOP articulating a UC position? The kind of caps being discussed are too low for UC faculty. See below for the latest: Pension focus shifts: hybrid, caps and the big one (excerpt) Ed Mendel, calpensions.com As Gov. Brown seeks crucial budget votes, one reform proposed by five Republican senators would switch new hires to “hybrid” pensions, a cost-cutting combination of lower pensions and 401(k)-style individual investment plans. The governor, who also…

| |

Will the State Budget Deal Cut the Heart Out of UC’s Recent Pension Changes? Are We Too Chicken to Make a Case With the Governor?

Perhaps you know of the old radio show in which a chicken heart grew until it took over everything and covered the world. As previous posts on this blog have noted, although the true deadline for getting the governor’s proposed tax extensions on the June ballot is somewhat flexible, we are coming close to the point where it becomes administratively impossible. The governor and the Democrats have evidently concluded that proposed strategies for doing the deal without a 2/3 vote for the ballot measure are impractical. So bargaining is going on with a few Republicans on the price for their…

| | |

CalPERS reported to be planning to cut its assumed investment return to seven and half

Pension funds, such as UC’s, use an assumed rate of return to estimate future earnings and calculate their unfunded liability. In the past, UC has had the most conservative rate of 7.5% as compared with CalPERS and CalSTRS. It was useful for UC to be able to note that it was more conservative than the others. Now it is reported that CalPERS will cut its assumed rate to the same level as UC, i.e., CalPERS will assume that for each dollar in the fund, it can earn seven and a half cents. Although there is no direct effect on UC…

| | | | |

Regents Ponder Questions (With the aid of a management consultant)

At the upcoming Regents session scheduled for the Ides of March, the Regents have invited a management consultant to help them ponder questions such as those below: * How can a more diverse student body be supported during a period of flattening or declining federal/or state appropriation? * How do we attract target students with the capacity to provide competitive tuition subsidization that is competitive with peer institutions? * Is the University effectively evaluating alternatives to traditional education practices (e.g. three year degrees, a multi-year tuition schedule) to help address student access and affordability issues? * How robustly is the…

| | | | | |

How Now Brown Budget? The Clock is Ticking

As previous posts have noted, Gov. Brown needs a 2/3 vote to put his tax extension proposals – which are an integral part of his budget plan – on the ballot by June. (The current fiscal year ends June 30.) It is unusual for a governor to testify before a legislative committee but he did so yesterday. Most of the testimony was in fact aimed at legislative Republicans who have made no-tax-increase pledges. A video of the testimony from the Sacramento Bee is below. The references to dispensations and vows refer both to the pledges and the governor’s Jesuit background….

| |

Little Hoover Now Bigger: Pension Report Released

It is going to take awhile to work through the full 100+ page report of the Little Hoover Commission on public pensions. See the previous post on this blog. However, UC is included in the report although much of the attention is on CalPERS, CalSTRS, and other plans. Below is a quote about UC: “The University of California system also maintains its own retirement plan, independent of the parameters set by the state for other pension plans. The state does not contribute directly to the UC pension program. For 20 years, the UC pension plan was funded entirely by investment…

| |

Harmonic Disturbance: Harman’s Pension Bill Explicitly Includes UC

SENATE BILL No. 689 Introduced by Senator Tom Harman (R-Huntington Beach) February 18, 2011 An act to add and repeal Section 7503.1 of the Government Code, relating to public retirement systems. Legislative counsel’s digest: SB 689, as introduced, Harman. Public retirement systems. Existing law requires all state and local public retirement systems to prepare an annual report in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The bill would, until January 1, 2016, require all state and local public retirement systems to file an annual report with the Legislature, the Department of Finance, and the Legislative Analyst’s Office that would include specified…

| | |

Presidents Day Report: Party of Lincoln Pushes Change in Public Pensions to Defined Contribution

As we have noted repeatedly, it’s potentially not over with regard to the UC pension. A ballot proposition could easily override the Regents’ action that was taken last December. The article below notes that pensions have become the negotiating point on the state budget and getting the governor’s proposed tax extensions on the ballot. Brown’s Countdown, Day 43: State pension cuts pushed (excerpts) Kevin Yamamura, Sacramento Bee, Feb. 21, 2011 Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger hailed pension cuts last year as a major reform after Democrats and state worker unions agreed to concessions that ended a record-long budget stalemate. But Republican…

| | | |

LAO’s Position is that State Pension Contributions to UC are Voluntary & Should Come With Conditions

The Legislative Analyst’s Office has released a video of about 15 minutes on public pensions. Most of the discussion deals with CalPERS, CalSTRS, and other systems. There are occasional references to UC at various points in the video. However, at the end it is stated that the state at some point should voluntarily contribute to UC but make that contribution conditional on the UC pension being more or less the same as other state systems. Put another way, the LAO’s position is that the state has no legal obligation to contribute at any point. Moreover, the video describes a future…