UC Regents

| |

Help Wanted

Byuclafaculty

SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER THE SELECTION OF A PRESIDENT, March 14, 2013 TO THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA The Committee presents the following from its meeting of March 13, 2013 CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY LEADERSHIP The President of the University of California must be a visionary leader with the judgment, creativity, and courage to enhance the quality and reputation of the University as one of the preeminent public research universities in the world. The President represents the University in its role as an international, national, and state exemplar in the education policy arena….

| | |

Survey Suggests It’s Time to Take a Deep Breath on MOOCs

Byuclafaculty

The Chronicle of Higher Education has a survey of 103 of 184 faculty members who have taught MOOCs.  The article that accompanies the survey is at: http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/#id=overview But the summary below should suggest anyone proposing rushing into this area on the grounds that it will save large amounts of money or even provide a route to credit at the institutions at which these faculty are based should take a deep breath before proceeding. The results are decidedly mixed and they come from a group of folks who are evidently enthused about the endeavor.  [Clicking on the images above will provide…

| | |

With One Question on Funding, Regents Approve UCLA New Med Center Building

Byuclafaculty

As predicted, the UC Regents approved the architectural and CEQA review for the planned new UCLA Teaching and Learning Center for the Health Sciences with a virtual rubber stamp.  There was one question on funding from a regent and the answer was that $120 million (!) would be raised from gifts.  No follow up on funding or costs was part of the approval.  By the way, if you raise $120 million by tapping donors, that means there will be less money from gifts that could be tapped for some other purpose.  In past regental reviews of this project, the issue…

| |

I guess the chemistry was good

Byuclafaculty

UC-Irvine has put a chemistry course on the web.  But it doesn’t give credit for it and isn’t using the Coursera website (although UC-Irvine is affiliated with Coursera) because it wants to give the course away free.  As for labs, it says that if some other institution wants to offer the course, it will have to provide the labs, etc.  We are likely to see a bunch of such offerings from the campus. They show the campus is up-to-date, complying with the Regents/governor desires, and yet – in the end – they commit to nothing.  Actually, yours truly has put…

| |

Regents to “Review” UCLA Teaching & Learning Center for Health Sciences

Byuclafaculty

The Regents will again be presented with a major UCLA capital project they have already discussed: The Teaching & Learning Center for the Health Sciences.  Regardless of the merits of this particular capital project or any other that comes before them from the campuses, in the end – as this blog has noted many times – the Regents have no independent review capability to evaluate capital proposals or to follow up on actual outcomes.  This particular project has a budget (see below) of $104.7 million, not chump change, plus another $6 million for furniture and equipment.  Past discussions at the…

| |

Audit Results to be Presented at Regents

Byuclafaculty

Page 10 of audit report [click on image for clearer view] At the upcoming Regents meeting, there will be a presentation of the annual audit report through fiscal year 2011-12 (the year ending June 30, 2012).  Among other things, it reports a $26 billion budget for what the auditor calls core activities, as can be seen above.  This audit definition of “core” should not be confused with the similar term used in the state budget for UC which refers only to basic teaching activities and is essentially the state appropriation plus tuition (roughly one out of five dollars in the…

| | | | | |

Regents Meeting Coming Next Week

Byuclafaculty

The Regents are meeting March 13-14 – Wednesday-Thursday of next week.  The agenda is only partly online.  At this point it just lists topics without the supporting materials.  One March 13 item is the UCLA Health Sciences Teaching and Learning Center which we are assured won’t cost the campus a penny.  Of course, we know the Regents will carefully undertake a review of the business plan using outside independent expertise and will be monitoring the project after it is built to ensure it is a total success, just as they did, and surely will do, with the Grand Hotel: http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/mar13/gb.pdf…

The Rogers Mystery Solved

Byuclafaculty

Yesterday, I posted the audio of the Regents Committee on Investments and noted the (phone) presence of someone referred to as Gary (and sometimes Gerry) who pushed for an examination of why the Regents’ endowment funds underperformed those of other major universities. http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2013/02/listen-to-uc.html Bill Jacobs of UC-SB filled me in on the identity of Gary/Gerry.  He is an advisor to the committee, not a Regent.  However, the odd thing is that the committee seemed unwilling to take his advice and seemed annoyed at even hearing it. Isn’t the purpose of an advisor to give, you know, advice? Nonetheless, despite the…

| | |

Listen to UC-Regents Committee on Investments 2-26-2013

Byuclafaculty

The Regents Committee on Investments met earlier today, in part by phone conference call.  Note our earlier post today which contains links to the agenda. A link to the audio of this meeting is below.  It is unclear whether the Regents plan to post the audio or video of this meeting.  Unlike the January meeting, I did not find audio or video archived on the web after this meeting.  So I have provided a link to a recording of the meeting below. Some highlights.  There was a dispute, not always in entirely friendly terms, between one Regent (“Gary” or sometimes…

| | | |

And here’s something you probably didn’t know…

Byuclafaculty

The Regents are meeting today.  Not all of them.  However, the Committee on Investments is meeting at 1:30 pm. On its agenda is possible changed guidance for investment of the UC pension plan portfolio.  My impression is that there has not been much Academic Senate involvement in the process of coming up with recommendations, although we have some well-known financial experts on the faculty.  You can find the Committee’s agenda and background documents at: http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/feb13/invest.pdf and particularly http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/feb13/i2.pdf http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/feb13/i2attach2.pdf http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/feb13/i2attach1.pdf Yours truly particularly liked the last link just above which says the new investment policy is slated to go into…