Author: admin

  • |

    End of the Line for Anderson Self Sufficiency?

    Byadmin

    The LA Business Journal carries a report today on the Academic Senate’s negative report on the Anderson plan for self sufficiency. (See earlier post on this topic.) Dean Olian characterizes the report as “misinterpretations.” The report suggested a more detailed review was needed, which would delay the plan. On the other hand, Senate chair Ann Kargozian said the Senate ultimately “isn’t closed” to self sufficiency. One has a sense that underneath the debate, the Anderson plan is seen (feared?) by some as quasi-privatization that could spread to other schools or the larger UC system. Some excerpts below: UCLA Business School…

  • | | |

    Straws in the Wind on External Pension Agitation

    Byadmin

    From time to time, I post a reminder that the pension reform movement could lead to a state ballot initiative that could override UC’s apparent move to a two-tier plan modeled on Option C. Here are two recent illustrations. Sanders proposes no pensions for new city hires: New employees would get 401(k) accounts; current workers not affected (excerpt) By Craig Gustafson November 19, 2010, San Diego Union-Tribune Mayor Jerry Sanders has proposed eliminating pensions for new non-public safety hires and giving them 401(k) accounts instead… Sanders said Friday he’ll gather signatures to put a measure before city voters that would…

  • | | |

    A Misleading Headline: Darrell Steinberg Blasts UC and CSU Fee Increases

    Byadmin

    Today’s Sacramento Bee Capitol Alert blog carries the headline “Darrell Steinberg blasts UC and CSU fee increases.” It goes on to describe a letter sent by California Senate President Darrell Steinberg addressed to Regents Chair Gould, UC President Yudof, and their counterparts at CSU. Here is an excerpt from the text of the Capitol Alert blog: Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, has written to state university chiefs to object to new fee increases after legislators restored and boosted state funding this year to the embattled systems. During tough budget negotiations, Steinberg said in a letter Thursday, “we provided…

  • | | | |

    A Little Help From Our Friends at Stanford

    Byadmin

    It seems likely that when the Regents meet for their special session in December, they will ultimately approve President Yudof’s recommendations on pensions and retiree health. If you listen to the Regents session of the last two days (see the earlier postings on this blog), the presentation of those recommendations went off with little debate. Furthermore, it seems unlikely that Jerry Brown, when he becomes governor, or the legislature would override UC or put something on the ballot that would sweep UC into some statewide pension reform plan. However, there is ongoing agitation in the state about the public pension…

  • | |

    UCLA and UC Well Represented on New Redistricting Commission

    Byadmin

    In 2008, voters approved taking redistricting legislative seats after the 2010 Census away from the legislature and gave the job to a citizens redistricting commission. In the recent election, they rejected abolishing the commission and gave it the additional task of redistricting congressional seats. Eight commissioners have so far been selected through a complicated process. UCLA and UC are well represented, as the report below from the Rose Institute at Claremont indicates. First 8 CA Commissioners are a Well-Educated Group The first 8 people chosen for California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission are a well-educated group. All 8 hold both a bachelor…

  • | | | | |

    Day 3: The Regents Session of 11-18-10

    Byadmin

    Below are links to audios (videos with a still picture) of the Regents meeting of 11-18-10. (The audio is divided into 13 parts due to duration limits of video-Yahoo.) The meeting began with public comments. In that session, a message was read from Assembly leader Perez protesting the tuition increase. President Yudof cited the lack of state pension contributions to UC in rebuttal. As in the previous day, the comments were those of students objecting to the tuition increase and unions generally objecting to the benefit changes and lack of input into them. Students also objected to the switch in…

  • | |

    LA Times/USC Poll on State Budget

    Byadmin

    The LA Times/USC poll reproduces, once again, the general public inconsistency about what to do about the state budget. Here (below) is a simplified version of the poll. The first figure is percentage support by program for not cutting spending or for increasing spending. The second figure represents percentage support for cutting spending a little or a lot. (Figures don’t add to 100% due to those answering “don’t know” or refusing.) K-12: 71% vs. 26% Health care for kids & low/moderate income families: 56% vs. 36% UC & CSU: 59% vs. 36% Transport, road, rail: 47% vs. 48% Prisons: 20%…

  • | | |

    New PPIC Poll on Public Higher Ed

    Byadmin

    A new poll on public higher ed is out from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC). In broad terms, Californians are evenly split on whether taxes should be raised to support higher ed. But they oppose tuition increases. They are more likely to say that not enough is being spent on higher ed than to support raising taxes. PPIC summarizes the findings as follows: About three-fourths of Californians say state funding for public higher education is inadequate. Most Californians favor more money for higher education even at the expense of other state programs. Almost 60 percent of all parents…

  • | | | | |

    Day 2: Regents Sessions 11-17-10

    Byadmin

    Below are audios (videos with a still picture) of the Regents session of 11-17-10. The morning sessions – which actually ran until about 12:30 PM – are divided into 16 parts. Most of the afternoon sessions were closed but the one open session is included. To hear the sessions, start by clicking the large circle below. Then click on the various urls below that. The afternoon open session is the last entry. Here is the agenda for 11-17-10: 8:30 am Committee of the Whole (public comment) 9:30 am Committee on Educational Policy (open session) 10:15 am Committee on Finance (open…