|

MOOC Moratorium at American University


MEMORANDUM [American University]
May 8, 2013
To: AU Faculty and Staff
From: Scott A. Bass, Provost
Re: MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) Moratorium at AU
On January 9, 2013, I issued to the deans a moratorium on MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) at AU. Recently, the Faculty Senate asked that I write to the campus community to clarify the current moratorium. In collaboration with the Faculty Senate, we are exploring the development of a policy regarding MOOCs at AU. The policy we craft will eventually be reviewed by the Board of Trustees. In the interim, there are many creative online instructional activities other than MOOCs in which the faculty may engage without violating the moratorium.
Guidelines for these activities are cited herein.
As you may be aware, the swift rise of MOOCs has created a bit of national stir. A number of leading universities have partnered to offer free online courses through newly formed organizations such as Coursera, Udacity, and edX and now serve thousands of students at no cost. Seeking to lower the cost of higher education, governors, legislators, and boards are exploring the possible requirement that public universities accept academic credit for demonstrated competence based on MOOC offerings.
AU has just begun to set its direction in the online world. We have moved cautiously, but deliberately, to explore offering some of the very best credit-bearing, face-to-face programs online.
MOOCs, however, are quite different from our efforts to offer online degree programs in that the courses are free, non-degree, and without credit. As an institution for which tuition is a financial necessity, our focus has been to find ways to offer our quality programs to a wider audience based on a traditional tuition model.

MOOCs raise a variety of important questions related to AU’s underlying economic model. For example, what are the implications for our existing courses offered at full-tuition or should a similar course be available by an AU faculty member through a MOOC that is free? While other universities may have worked through such issues, their financial underpinnings may be different than ours.

Other pertinent questions follow:
  • What are the cost/benefits of offering a MOOC at AU?
  • What is the justification for release time for an AU faculty member to teach for free?
  • What is the initial course approval process by the unit and Faculty Senate?
  • What is the approval process to allow a faculty member to teach a MOOC?
  • Should there be evidence of quality prior instruction in order to be allowed to teach a MOOC?
  • What is the role of the academic unit in oversight of the course?
  • What are the legal responsibilities for a MOOC?
These are but a few of the que
stions that merit further discussion among faculty, deans, legal counsel, and university administration.
Despite these very real concerns, the Faculty Senate has suggested the following guidelines regarding permissible creative online activity (other than the university’s regular tuition-generating, online, or hybrid courses offered through our schools and colleges) that may be undertaken and that do not violate the university’s MOOC moratorium:
Traditional educational activities involving the exchange of material online, such as sharing a collection of lectures, i-Tunes [sic] material, workshops, blogs, and presentations, are permissible and does [sic] not require additional approval.

1. The activities should be non-credit bearing and free and may not be full courses;

2. The activities may be informal, but may not be graded or formally evaluated lead to an academic certificate, badge, recognition or credential, bear academic credit, or offer certification of completion;
3. University resources are dedicated to the delivery of official AU online and face-to-face courses, and the delivery of other material should not utilize these resources;

4. Regular university obligations associated with teaching, scholarship, service, and other duties as assigned are priority and other creative online activities should not interfere with these priority obligations;
5. Faculty and staff must inform his or her chair, program director, or supervisor of such educational activities; and

6. Attribution of the affiliation with American University should be prominent without use of the AU logo.
The MOOC moratorium, and the aforementioned guidelines, will be in effect until a policy and practices related to this new online venue are approved.

Source: http://chronicle.com/article/The-Memo-American-Us-MOOC/139137/ 

And some appropriate moratorium (moritatium?) music:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqauNZlqe6k?feature=player_detailpage]

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Jerry Brown Looks for an Online Course that Requires No Human Interaction

    At the Regents meeting of January 22, 2014, Gov. Brown seems to be searching for an online course that requires no human interaction.  Such a course, he reasons, could have unlimited enrollment because it is completely self-contained.  He gets some pushback from UC Provost Dorr, who thinks courses should have such interaction.  You can hear this excerpt at the link below.  The entire meeting of the Committee on Educational Policy of the Regents was posted yesterday.[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tYFLJvrE3g?feature=player_detailpage]

  • | | | | | | |

    Listen to Part of the Regents Afternoon Session of 1-22-2014

    As we have noted in numerous prior posts, the Regents refuse to archive their meetings beyond one year.  So we dutifully record the sessions in real time.  Below is a link to part of the afternoon session of Jan. 22.  This segment is mainly the Committee on Educational Policy.  Gov. Brown was in attendance.  We will separately (later) provide links just to certain Brown segments.  But for now, we provide a continuous recording. There was discussion of designating certain areas of UC-Merced as nature reserves, followed by discussion of a new telescope.  The discussion then turned to online ed and…

  • | |

    MOOCs in the Muck

    Good question! Inside Higher Ed today runs an article on MOOC offerings at the U of Texas and Cornell.  At the former, there are the usual extremely low completion rates.  At the latter, resident students are asking the question in the photo at the right: …”A year after UT began rolling out nine Massive Online Open Courses, the results are in,” The Daily Texan wrote in a Jan. 29 editorial… Among the “results” are completion rates ranging from 1 to 13 percent, the lack of credit granting courses and the $150,000 to $300,000 production costs…  (S)tudents at Cornell voiced similar concerns,…

  • |

    MOOc

    An interesting analysis of MOOCs in a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper by Stanford economist Caroline M. Hoxby suggests that heavy dependence on online ed won’t work for what she terms highly selective post-secondary educational institutions.  In essence, such institutions depend in important ways on alumni loyalty which is hard to obtain if students take courses online that come from anywhere. Abstract: I consider how online postsecondary education, including massive open online courses (MOOCs), might fit into economically sustainable models of postsecondary education. I contrast nonselective postsecondary education (NSPE)in which institutions sell fairly standardized educational services in return…

  • | |

    Whatever happened to the era of limits?

    In his first iteration as governor, back in the 1970s and early 1980s, Gov. Brown emphasized the “era of limits.”  Yesterday at the Regents, however, he apparently wanted to push those limits when it came to online education:  Jerry Brown pushes UC to find “outer limits” of online education …Sitting in on part of Wednesday’s meeting, Brown challenged regents to develop classes that require no “human intervention” and might expand the system’s reach beyond its student body.  “If this university can probe into” black holes, he said, “can’t somebody create a course — Spanish, calculus, whatever — totally online? That…