|

Posting Salaries

Byuclafaculty

As is well known, state salaries are posted on websites available from such sources as the Sacramento Bee. You can go to the Bee website and find salary by name of a particular employee, including UC employees.

Last October, I wrote an op ed for UCLA Today asking why the Bee thought it was a good idea to publish state salaries by name which could encourage identity theft or other abuse. The Bee could have alternatively provided the basic information using just job titles, pay distribution charts, etc., that would not identify individuals. See http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/documents/areas/fac/hrob/bee-post.pdf I asked the Bee why it would not choose to publish its own payroll by name of employee. Surely, readers would be curious to know what this or that reporter or columnist earned. There was a back and forth exchange with a Bee editor. Note that the issue was not whether the Bee was legally entitled to publish state salaries by name but whether it was a good idea to do so. (Of course, there is no legal bar to the Bee publishing its own payroll info and it certainly has easy access to the data.)

Those who have been following the City of Bell scandal – see an earlier post if not – know that the state controller has now ordered cities and counties to publish public salary data. There is now such a database for LA City at http://www.contact.lacity.org/controller/lacityp_011220.pdf What is interesting is that it does not identify workers by name. Thus, for example, you can learn at the top of page 522 that there was a “gardener caretaker” working for the City who earned $47,836.08. But the name of that particular gardener is not reported. Thus, if you think it is a scandal for the City of LA to pay that amount to a gardener – either because it is too much or too little – you now have the information you need to be righteously indignant. Or if you are just curious about what a City gardener makes, you have that information. Of course, some top city officials, e.g., the mayor, can be identified by just knowing their titles.

Just an observation.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Another of our periodic email cautionary notes

    Byuclafaculty

    From time to time, we have provided reminders about email problems.  One problem – which we have noted – is that at a public university, your emails may be subject to public documents requests. Another problem is that hackers may try to get into your email account through “phishing,” probably to use it to send out scam messages to your contacts.  Such an event seems to have occurred at UC-Davis: Hackers compromised the email accounts of three UC Davis doctors last month, potentially gaining access to personal or medical information on as many as 1,800 patients, the university announced Monday… …

  • |

    Ahead of the Curve

    Byuclafaculty

    The curved neuroscience building Inside Higher Ed takes note of the recent UCLA policy on requests to faculty for public documents such as emails.  Blog readers will recall a recent posting on that new policy. …Carole Goldberg, a professor of law and vice chancellor of academic personnel at UCLA, is co-chair of the joint Academic Senate-Administration Task Force on Academic Freedom, which drafted the statement. She said that no particular incident at UCLA had inspired the statement, but that faculty and administrators wanted to “get ahead of the curve” on academic freedom and scholarly communications, in light of several high-profile…

  • | |

    Someone may want to see what you are doing

    Byuclafaculty

    Faculty should have received the email from Chancellor Block below regarding public documents requests for such things as emails.  The statement is good.  The two links provided are also useful.  But when you get through reading them, you should still regard virtually anything you email or write as potentially a public document.  Yes, various exemptions exist.  But there are gray areas.  In addition, an email you sent to someone else at another public institution – maybe in another state – might be made public there.  Even if you deleted it, the recipient may have it.  That is the reality.============ Dear…

  • Unsolicited Advice for All UCLA and UC Faculty

    Byuclafaculty

    Yesterday, we provided some unsolicited – and maybe unwelcome? – advice for the folks in Murphy Hall.  Today, we provide some advice for all UCLA and UC faculty.  Actually, it is a reminder of advice that we give from time to time.  We live in an age where the word “transparency” has taken on an aura of unmitigated goodness.  In practice, transparency – at public universities – can mean invasions of privacy when it comes to emails.  Emails at public universities are subject to public documents requests.  From time to time, groups that don’t like what some faculty has said…

  • | |

    No silver bullet?

    Byuclafaculty

    From the LA Times: Californians will get the first chance to comment on President Obama’s proposals to make college more affordable during a public forum this week at Cal State Dominguez Hills, officials said. The Wednesday event is the first in a series of four public sessions held around the country — and the only one in California — to gather input on the president’s recently announced agenda to develop a college ratings system to help students select schools with the best bang for their buck… The ratings score card would be developed for the 2015 school year using such…

  • | | | | | | |

    Scary Thoughts for Halloween

    Byuclafaculty

    Over the past year or so, there have been various scary developments about which we have blogged.  Most recently there is the recently-filed anti-pension initiative that sweeps in UC.  There is the volatility of state budget because of its heavy dependence on the income tax and the incomes of those in the upper brackets that are reflective of the ups and downs of financial markets.  There is the illusion that online ed will resolve the long-term budget squeeze on the university. The hotel shown below is pretty scary but so, too, is the UCLA Grand Hotel, in part because of…