| |

Aint that a shame?

Byuclafaculty

It was another slow day at the worksite of the UCLA Grand Hotel yesterday.  The photo above was taken around 10:30 am.  Apparently, there was more action in the courtroom.  According to a media release put out by UCLA, a court decision removed the donors from one of the two lawsuits against the Grand Hotel.  (One lawsuit says the environmental review wasn’t done properly; the other says the hotel will have to pay taxes.)  You can find the media release at:

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/donors-ucla-foundation-removed-248713.aspx

The Daily Bruin version, based on the release, is at:
http://dailybruin.com/2013/10/02/luskins-ucla-foundation-dismissed-as-defendants-in-case/

According to the media release, it was “shameful” that the plaintiffs had included the donors.  Actually, there are other aspects – not mentioned in the media release – that are a shame, as this blog has pointed out many times.  It is a shame that UCLA (and other UC campuses) are focusing donations on physical plant rather than human capital.  It is a shame that the Regents have no independent review capacity for reviewing hundreds of millions of dollars of capital projects that are quickly passed before them and ultimately rubber-stamp the plans.  It is a shame that at Regents meetings, the governor focuses on the petty cash drawer – MOOCs and online education – while ignoring the trainloads of money in capital projects whizzing by.  It is a shame that donor money is somehow regarded as not subject to trade-offs.  (Channeling more of it into X means less available for Y.) 

Ain’t that a shame?

Similar Posts

| |

College Diversity Requirement Gathers Support

Byuclafaculty

The following statement has been circulating among faculty today and has about 80 co-signers as of Wednesday afternoon. We Support the College Diversity Requirement We, the undersigned faculty of the University of California, Los Angeles, express our enthusiastic support for a College Diversity Requirement for students within the College of Letters and Science. Our signatures reflect our confidence in the process, proposal, and the expected benefits of such a requirement for our students and our campus more generally. We recognize fully that for over 30 years, generations of students have worked hard alongside faculty in achieving this goal and now…

| |

College of Letters and Science Faculty Vote on Diversity Requirement

Byuclafaculty

UCLA faculty with appointments in the College of Letters and Science are voting this week on a proposed Diversity Requirement for undergraduate students  in the College. The vote is open between October 24th and October 31st. The Academic Senate has an extensive informational site (votediversity.ucla.edu) that includes documentation on the requirement, a frequently asked questions section, and a forum for faculty to share information and views on the requirement. The forum includes six separate faculty statements in support of the requirement, and one statement in opposition. An additional statement in support circulating on Wednesday has garnered about 80 co-signers. The…

| |

Dig a Deeper Hole?

Byuclafaculty

The plaintiffs in the case against the UCLA Grand Hotel have filed an amended brief.  You can read it at the link below.  There are actually two cases, one involving environmental and other matters and another regarding the tax issue.  The environmental case will be heard in September.  And there is legal skirmishing around the tax case. The tax issue is basically that if the hotel is a commercial operation, it has to pay taxes just as would any other hotel.  There is also an issue of whether the Regents can run a commercial enterprise and, if that’s what they…