The Regents Committee on Compliance and Audit met on February 28, 2012 ahead of the March meeting. When the Faculty Association requested a copy of the audio for this meeting, as it now always does, it turned out that the meeting had been taped (analog-recorded) rather than recorded digitally. Thus, the Regents’ office sent the analog recording out for conversion to digital format. There were then other delays which account for why only now are we able to post the audio. It remains unclear why the audio of meetings of the Regents, which are streamed live, cannot simply be posted as an archive on the Regents website. However, as long as that simple step is not being taken, the Faculty Association will continue to post the audios as received.
- Public Comment Period
- Action Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of November 7, 2011
- A3 Action Approval of the Scope of the External Audit for the Year Ending June 30, 2012
- A4 Action Approval of External Audit Plan for the Year Ending June 30, 2012
- A5 Discussion Organizing Technology for Shared Systems
- A6 Discussion University of California Health Sciences Privacy Compliance
- A7 Discussion Internal Audit Activities Report
- A8 Discussion Ethics and Compliance Activities Report
- A9 Discussion Chief Financial Officer Division AIM Report: Actionable Information for Managers
- A10 Information University of California International Activities Update
did you post the audio or your comment for this part of the March meeting?: http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/regents/regmeet/mar12/a3.pdfdid you comment on the captive insurance discussion from the May meeting?many thanks for posting the audio.
also, on this post you have of other audio: http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2012/05/listen-to-audio-of-regents-5-16-12.htmlat the 84:00 mark on F4 could you explain the exchange b/ween Gould and Taylor about General Credit of Regents pledge and Prop 13 Gen Ob credits pledge and the if it would be possible "huge savings above and beyond what we have now" etc claims- do you have any thoughts on that exchange? a truth o meter fact check or something on that exchange?