| | |

At Last, Something Is Heard

We at this blog have been waiting for UCOP and the Regents to get involved in the state budget. It’s late in the game – a simple-majority budget was passed last night that (as previously noted on this blog) chops another $150 million from UC. But at last, we are hearing from UC’s powers-that-be.

Gov. Brown could veto the budget. If he signs it, he could cut spending in particular lines but can’t raise spending. However, other bills can be enacted that modify the budget. In any case, the UCOP press release reproduced below in italics could be the start of more activism. Let’s hope.

What has been needed all along is a deal between UC and the state (governor, legislators, Legislative Analyst, Dept. of Finance, interest groups). Such a deal would not be a de facto one-way commitment by UC (as under the old “compact” with the previous governor). It would have contingencies indicating that for X (dollars) from the state UC does Y (tuition subsidy, access, etc.). But if X is reduced, Y is reduced accordingly. If the state continues to insist it has no responsibility for the UC pension, that insistence is, in effect, a reduction in X.

For its roughly $2.5 billion, the state gets a university with a $20 billion budget that includes a significant inflow of funds from the feds. No other state program, not one!, has a multiplier effect on the state’s economy even approaching that mark. And that immediate multiplier does not include longer term effects on state growth and labor force enhancement.

Yudof, Gould respond to legislators’ budget plan

Date: 2011-06-15
Contact: UC Office of the President
Phone: (510) 987-9200

In response to the Legislature’s budget plan, University of California President Mark Yudof and Board of Regents Chairman Russell Gould issued the following statement today (June 15):

The new budget plan released and approved by the Legislature within the last 24 hours is unacceptable for our state’s public universities. It’s unacceptable to our students and their families, and it should be unacceptable to all Californians. We oppose its implementation, and will marshal the voices of people throughout the state to urge that Governor Brown restore our funds.

Our message to Governor Brown and the Legislature is simple: No more cuts to higher education. We cannot let this plan stand. UC, like the California State University, already has taken steps to absorb a $500 million cut with substantial impacts to programs on the campuses. An additional $150 million in cuts will impair our ability to provide access at an affordable price while preserving academic excellence and allowing students to complete their degrees in a timely way.

If this budget plan stands, the likely result will be a double-digit tuition increase on top of the 8 percent hike already approved for next year. And to require UC to carry a $500 million “loan” balance into fiscal year 2012-13 because the state can’t provide UC with the fully budgeted allocation will only force the university to incur extra costs that are passed on to students and their parents. In addition, this budget plan poses a threat to UC and higher education in future years as it fails to achieve a sustainable, balanced budget. Without a stable, predictable funding base, our long-term quality is seriously threatened. The world-class education, research and public service provided by the University of California fuel the economy and contribute to the well being of millions of people throughout the state. This budget plan would be bad for all Californians. That’s why we will fight it.

The release is at http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/25753

Anyway, at last:

UPDATE: Gov. Brown vetoed the budget today 6-16-11.

Similar Posts

  • | | | |

    UCLA-FA files Unfair Labor Practices charge against UC

    LOS ANGELES, CA (June 5, 2024) – On June 3rd, the UCLA Faculty Association (UCLAFA) filed unfair labor practice (ULP) charges against the University of California (UC) to vindicate faculty rights to protest, organize, and exercise academic freedom. The ULP charges the UC for UCLA’s failure to uphold, and their choice to interfere with, faculty’s legally protected rights during and after the recent UCLA Palestine Solidarity Encampment. This is the fourth organization to file a ULP against the UC in the wake of its actions at UCLA in late April and early May, following charges by UAW, UC-AFT and AFSCME….

  • | | |

    Faculty associations address UCOP

    The UCLA Faculty Association is part of a UC-wide coalition of faculty associations known as CUCFA–the Coalition of UC Faculty Associations. Through CUCFA, UC faculty are able to address the UC Office of the President on issues of importance to faculty, their students, and staff. Below is a round-up of recent communication between CUCFA and UCOP. UC Union Coalition on Health Insurance Costs CUCFA signed on to a joint letter from unions representing employees across the UC system expressing concern with large increases in the cost of health insurance. The unions requested a meeting to “address what appears to be…

  • Faculty call for pause on budget & network security changes at UCLA

    Over 250 UCLA faculty, including a large number of department chairs and center directors, have written Chancellor Block with a detailed critique of plans for administrative centralization. The letter follows earlier exchanges between department chairs and Executive Vice Chancellor/Provost Emily Carter and other top administrators. “Although we appreciated the fora that EVC/P Carter recently organized in response to an earlier letter requesting more time to evaluate the re-organization plans she is proposing, we continue to feel that there has been insufficient time or detail to evaluate their consequences and that we have not been adequately involved in the consultation process,”…

  • | | |

    Academic Council knocks UCOP data policy

    The Academic Council of the UC Academic Senate called for significant revisions to a proposed new university policy on “Research Data and Tangible Research Materials.” The Council characterized the proposed policy as, “overly broad, difficult to enforce, and a potential danger to faculty intellectual property.” Previously, the Berkeley Faculty Association criticized the policy as a solution in search of a problem, and a danger to faculty academic freedom. As the BFA noted, the policy opens with a sweeping assertion of new university rights, “The Regents of the University of California owns all Research Data and Tangible Research Materials,” and goes…

  • |

    Report: Affordable Public Higher Education is Possible Today

    A report this week from Reclaim California Higher Education (a coalition of faculty and student groups) makes the case that affordable (even free) higher education is within reach for California. The privatization experiment has failed. The harm to a generation of hard-working, high-aiming young people is proven. It’s time to return to what works: the proven Master Plan for higher education in California. California, with its own resources, can afford to restore top-quality, accessible, affordable college and university opportunity to every qualified student. In fact, Californians can afford nothing less. You can read a summary and download the entire report…