| | |

Good News/Bad News on UC Budget

The Sacramento Bee reports good news/bad news on the UC budget. Although the article doesn’t say so, part of the funding for UC (and CSU) for this fiscal year is coming from federal stimulus monies which disappear next year.

After massive cuts, higher ed funding rises in new California budget (excerpt)

Oct. 20, 2010, Laurel Rosenhall

A wave of mass student protests, a new lobbying strategy by university leaders, and the governor’s desire to leave a positive legacy in education during his final year in office led to a remarkable turnaround for California’s public colleges in the budget he signed earlier this month.

In a state budget full of funding cuts – to social services, child care, prisons and state worker benefits – higher education was one of the few areas of government to receive more money this year than last. State funding for California State University went up by more than 11 percent over last year, while state funding for the University of California went up by more than 12 percent.

Compare that to the prior year, when both university systems saw state funding slashed by 20 percent. They responded by eliminating classes, reducing the number of students they served and jacking up tuition – prompting protests throughout the state and a new focus on advocacy.

The two university systems and the community colleges banded together in their lobbying efforts this year, creating what many people described as a more effective message. Campus and student leaders worked together to persuade lawmakers that investing in higher education would help California’s economic recovery – and that continued cuts would ruin one of the state’s strongest assets.

It was “in those thoughtful meetings, where very powerful arguments were made” that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger decided he should increase funding for higher education, said Bonnie Reiss, the governor’s secretary of education.

So now that universities are receiving more money from the state, what can students expect?

A mixed bag.

The good news: At UC and CSU, it should be easier to get classes because universities will use some of the new money to expand course offerings. And many community college students who couldn’t transfer to CSU last year because of the budget cuts will be able to get in this spring when California State campuses admit 30,000 new students.

The bad news: Tuition will probably continue to rise.

That’s because even though universities fared well in this year’s budget, they’re still getting less money from the state than they did a few years ago and are looking for ways to fill the gap.

…UC’s governing Board of Regents is likely to vote on next year’s fee levels in November or January.

Given the bleak predictions for next year’s state budget, it’s unlikely universities will hold the line on fees, said Steve Boilard, director of higher education for the Legislative Analyst’s Office.

“I would be shocked if there was not a fee increase,” he said. “If I had to guess, I’d put it in the range of roughly 10 percent for each segment again.”

Full article at http://www.sacbee.com/2010/10/20/3117160/after-massive-cuts-higher-ed-funding.html

Similar Posts

  • |

    Spotlight on Speech Codes, 2022

    Fire (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) has just released its yearly summary of the state of free speech at 481 public and private colleges and universities in the United States. FIRE defines free speech as “the overwhelming majority of speech protected by the First Amendment.” Few exceptions exist. The survey addresses a wide variety of issues with relevance to free speech, including: Free Speech Zone PoliciesPrior RestraintsSecurity Fee PoliciesPolicies Governing Speakers, Demonstrations, and RalliesPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechInternet Usage PoliciesPolicies on Tolerance, Respect, and CivilityBullying PoliciesThreats and IntimidationHarassmentPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechObscenityIncitement The report is both disappointing…

  • |

    Report: Affordable Public Higher Education is Possible Today

    A report this week from Reclaim California Higher Education (a coalition of faculty and student groups) makes the case that affordable (even free) higher education is within reach for California. The privatization experiment has failed. The harm to a generation of hard-working, high-aiming young people is proven. It’s time to return to what works: the proven Master Plan for higher education in California. California, with its own resources, can afford to restore top-quality, accessible, affordable college and university opportunity to every qualified student. In fact, Californians can afford nothing less. You can read a summary and download the entire report…

  • | |

    Jerry Brown Suggests Master Plan is Dated

    Our previous post covered the Jan. 22 meeting of the Regents’ Committee on Educational Policy.  As noted, there was discussion of the 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education, considered a major accomplishment of Brown’s father when he was governor. Below is a link to Brown’s comments in which he suggested the Plan was now dated.  [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RmjI4gVync?feature=player_detailpage]

  • | | | | | | |

    Listen to Part of the Regents Afternoon Session of 1-22-2014

    As we have noted in numerous prior posts, the Regents refuse to archive their meetings beyond one year.  So we dutifully record the sessions in real time.  Below is a link to part of the afternoon session of Jan. 22.  This segment is mainly the Committee on Educational Policy.  Gov. Brown was in attendance.  We will separately (later) provide links just to certain Brown segments.  But for now, we provide a continuous recording. There was discussion of designating certain areas of UC-Merced as nature reserves, followed by discussion of a new telescope.  The discussion then turned to online ed and…

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Tradition!

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a report on UC and CSU funding.  LAO is usually viewed as a neutral agency.  But it is a component of the legislature.  So it tends to favor approaches that add to legislative control as opposed to, say, gubernatorial control.  This report is no exception. LAO seems to want to return to what it terms the “traditional” approach to funding, but with bells and whistles added to monitor legislative goals.  The traditional approach seems to be one focused on undergraduate enrollment.  But in fact the tradition – such as it is – has…