|

Cash Management

With a budget now enacted, the state controller is authorized to make payments that have been held up. The problem is that the budget enactment did not create more cash. Indeed, not having a budget conserved cash precisely because payments were not being made.

Excerpts from the website of controller John Chiang:

How bad is the State’s cash flow?

Unfortunately, the more than three-month long stalemate over a spending plan resulted in the State being unable to make more than $8.3 billion in payments to small businesses, community clinics, and local governments since July 1. After accounting for September’s cash receipts and expenditures, the State’s available cash to make all payments dips to just $3.5 billion at the end of October, creating a need for at least $4.8 billion additional funds in October alone…

What payments will be delayed?

The majority of the delayed payments authorized by AB 1624 will be to agencies that continued to receive payments since July 1, even though there was no budget in place. Until there is sufficient funding AB 1624 authorizes the temporary delay of payments to K-12 for Proposition 98 appropriations, personal and business income tax refunds, CalWorks Stage 1 child care, the University of California and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System. These deferrals provide the cash necessary to pay back small businesses that contract with the State, community clinics, local programs and most other entities that went without payment during the three-month budget delay…

Why don’t you just issue registered warrants, or IOUs?

Registered warrants, or IOUs, are the option of last resort when the State is faced with a cash deficit. Issuing IOUs makes it much more difficult and expensive to obtain external loans, or Revenue Anticipation Notes (RANs), that are needed to smooth over cash shortages during the first eight months of the fiscal year until tax revenues begin arriving during the last four months. While the Controller does not believe IOUs are warranted at this time, they are still a possibility, depending on how October and November receipts and expenditures compare to budget projections, whether there are elements in the newly-enacted budget that will provide cash to the State, how big an external borrowing will be required, and how quickly that borrowing can be secured…

I am a college student. Will my CalGrant be delayed?

Without a budget in place, the Controller was unable to make CalGrant payments to the University of California and California State University systems, as well as California Community Colleges. Under AB 1624, CalGrant payments for UC and CSU students will continue to be delayed until no later than December 10. However, UC and CSU officials have assured the state financial officers that they will cover the CalGrants for their students until the state payments have been made. CalGrant payments for community college students that were delayed as a result of the 100-day budget impasse will now be paid.

Full item at http://sco.ca.gov/fiscal_2010-11_budget_payment_status_faq.html

Similar Posts

  • |

    Spotlight on Speech Codes, 2022

    Fire (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) has just released its yearly summary of the state of free speech at 481 public and private colleges and universities in the United States. FIRE defines free speech as “the overwhelming majority of speech protected by the First Amendment.” Few exceptions exist. The survey addresses a wide variety of issues with relevance to free speech, including: Free Speech Zone PoliciesPrior RestraintsSecurity Fee PoliciesPolicies Governing Speakers, Demonstrations, and RalliesPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechInternet Usage PoliciesPolicies on Tolerance, Respect, and CivilityBullying PoliciesThreats and IntimidationHarassmentPolicies on Bias and Hate SpeechObscenityIncitement The report is both disappointing…

  • |

    Report: Affordable Public Higher Education is Possible Today

    A report this week from Reclaim California Higher Education (a coalition of faculty and student groups) makes the case that affordable (even free) higher education is within reach for California. The privatization experiment has failed. The harm to a generation of hard-working, high-aiming young people is proven. It’s time to return to what works: the proven Master Plan for higher education in California. California, with its own resources, can afford to restore top-quality, accessible, affordable college and university opportunity to every qualified student. In fact, Californians can afford nothing less. You can read a summary and download the entire report…

  • | |

    Jerry Brown Suggests Master Plan is Dated

    Our previous post covered the Jan. 22 meeting of the Regents’ Committee on Educational Policy.  As noted, there was discussion of the 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education, considered a major accomplishment of Brown’s father when he was governor. Below is a link to Brown’s comments in which he suggested the Plan was now dated.  [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RmjI4gVync?feature=player_detailpage]

  • | | | | | | |

    Listen to Part of the Regents Afternoon Session of 1-22-2014

    As we have noted in numerous prior posts, the Regents refuse to archive their meetings beyond one year.  So we dutifully record the sessions in real time.  Below is a link to part of the afternoon session of Jan. 22.  This segment is mainly the Committee on Educational Policy.  Gov. Brown was in attendance.  We will separately (later) provide links just to certain Brown segments.  But for now, we provide a continuous recording. There was discussion of designating certain areas of UC-Merced as nature reserves, followed by discussion of a new telescope.  The discussion then turned to online ed and…

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Tradition!

    The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) has issued a report on UC and CSU funding.  LAO is usually viewed as a neutral agency.  But it is a component of the legislature.  So it tends to favor approaches that add to legislative control as opposed to, say, gubernatorial control.  This report is no exception. LAO seems to want to return to what it terms the “traditional” approach to funding, but with bells and whistles added to monitor legislative goals.  The traditional approach seems to be one focused on undergraduate enrollment.  But in fact the tradition – such as it is – has…