faculty pay

|

Do You Have an Opinion on APM 0668 – Negotiated Salary Program?

To: UCLA Senate Faculty From: the UCLA Faculty Association Date: Oct. 26, 2011 Subject: UCLA FA Bulletin on APM 0668 – the proposed Negotiated Salary Program In times like these—budget cuts to higher education statewide and to UC year after year—it is good to know about the Faculty Association (FA) at UCLA, an independent organization of faculty on this campus since 1973. Its focus is singular: the general welfare of UCLA Senate faculty on the general campus and health sciences. Because it is state funded, the Academic Senate cannot use its resources to speak out on political issues. It is…

|

Attention to Pay

There is a proposal for a new negotiated pay system for faculty. Yours truly suggests you pay close attention since it is your pay that is involved. The cover letter indicates that employees (presumably faculty) should be consulted. The proposal is at: http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/senate/underreview/APM-668SystemwideReviewRequestandmaterials.pdf

|

UC Compensation Data Report for 2010

UC has released its annual compensation report for 2010. Below are some highlights: *Approximately 40% of compensation in 2010 went to academic employees, primarily to faculty and researchers. The remaining 60% went to non-academic employees, including those who support academic departments, student services, patient care and other university functions. As in previous years, the “top 10 earning” employees at UC in 2010, based on total pay, were health sciences faculty members – typically world-renowned specialists in their fields – and athletic coaches. • Market positions have eroded and are expected to worsen due to lack of salary increases, rising employee…

| | |

Golden Silence?

Our colleagues at CSU and the community colleges feel the need to be outspoken about the impact of state budget cuts and possible upcoming “trigger” cuts to higher ed. Somehow, UC is not being quoted in the various news articles about this recent trend in public complaints. Is UC’s silence golden? Contrary to the headline on yesterday’s post on this blog, maybe more needs to be said. Example 1: Outgoing SF State President Slams Governor: Brown “doesn’t seem to appreciate high-quality education in California” Story at http://www.baycitizen.org/education/story/outgoing-sf-state-president-slams/ Example 2: California is witnessing a slow and steady decline of its prized…

| |

UC opts out of controller’s public pay database (and shouldn’t)

Below is a news article and a comment by yours truly that follows the article: UC opts out of controller’s public pay database (excerpt) 8/18/11, San Diego Union-Tribune Hundreds of government agencies across the state, from the Vista Irrigation District to the Governor’s Office, have provided state Controller John Chiang with detailed salary and benefit information on public employees. Not the University of California… The UC system is the only state agency that has not complied. UC officials said they already maintain a listing of employee salaries, with formulas to estimate the cost of other benefits. The complete database of…

|

Yudof Announces Merit Pay Increase Plan

President Yudof has issued a letter today indicating there will be merit-based pay raises for faculty “at all levels” of 3% and non-represented (nonunion) staff earning up to $200,000. It is unclear exactly what this means for faculty (who get step and promotion advances). The letter is at http://www.scribd.com/doc/62519367/Pres-Yudof-Letter-081711 A Sacramento Bee description of the letter and some background is at http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/08/university-of-california-employees-may-get-raises-mark-yudof.html Clearly, a golden future awaits: Update: There is a LA Times version of this story at http://www.latimes.com/health/la-me-uc-pay-20110818,0,298613.story But it does not make the matter any clearer. Update: The San Francisco Chronicle version tends to put a negative spin…

| |

Regents to Be Asked to Leave Pay Increases to the President

There will be other items on the agenda of the upcoming Regents meeting (July 12-14) apart from the budget-related tuition increase discussed in early blog posts. For example, the Regents are asked to delegate certain authority over pay increases to the UC president: Regents Policy 7203, adopted in November 2005 and subsequently amended in July 2010, established the goal of obtaining, prioritizing, and directing funds, to the extent such funds were available, to increase salaries to achieve market comparability for all groups of employees over a ten year period. Upon adoption, the policy included language requiring annual approval by the…

|

Pay Freeze Bill Melts

A bill in the state Assembly that would have frozen pay of most state workers above $150,000 until 2014 has died. The bill would not have covered UC would contained language urging UC to follow its guideline. Specifically: (9) (A) At a time when the University of California Board of Regents is raising student fees, it is imperative that they show leadership and fiscal responsibility for two years by not granting raises or bonuses for employees that make in excess of $150,000 per year. (B) The Legislature urges the Regents of the University of California and the Board of Directors…

| | | | |

The Regents Are Coming; The Regents Are Coming

The Regents will be meeting next week, May 17-18. By way of a preview, here are some excerpts from background documents for the Regents Committee on Finance, slated for May 18. Excerpt 1: Full document at http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/regents/regmeet/may11/f6.pdf Compensation. The baseline model assumes annual compensation cost increases of three percent for both represented and non-represented staff and faculty, in addition to the regular academic merit salary increase program, totaling $533 million by 2015-16. While compensation likely will continue to lag substantially behind the market, three percent increases are critical to retain and recruit the faculty and staff needed to maintain UC’s…

Yours Truly is Still Waiting

The Contra Costa Times today is complaining that some public entities – but no UC- have not yet provided it with all of their salary data so it could publish them on its website. The article includes the following quote: “It’s insane, absolutely asinine” that some governments continue to balk at making compensation data readily public, said Tom Newton, executive director of the California Newspaper Publishers Association. Full article at http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_17916681 As yours truly has done with the Orange County Register and the Sacramento Bee, I have posted a modest request on the Contra Costa Times website: While you’re waiting…